You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many RNAseq accessions do not make explicit whether the RNA prep was total or polyA. I think TrimGalore and cutadapt require -a "A{10}" to trim poly-A tails. My concern is the implications on expression and splicing analyses of not removing polyA tails in oligo(dt) selected libraries?
Like RSeQC infer_experiment.py is used to generate a warning for strandedness fail, I wondered if a similar warning could be created with Qualimap:Genomic Origin or RSeqQC read distribution when intronic reads are < 10% indicative of polyA selection? And suggest to re-run the pipeline with -a "A{10}" ?
Many thanks,
Oliver
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @ojziff would there be any harm in always trimming poly(A) tails? Just added fastp support in #970 where you can use --trimmer fastp --extra_fastp_args '--trim_poly_x' which should trim the polyA tails by default along with any adapter sequences.
Description of feature
Hi there,
Many RNAseq accessions do not make explicit whether the RNA prep was total or polyA. I think TrimGalore and cutadapt require
-a "A{10}"
to trim poly-A tails. My concern is the implications on expression and splicing analyses of not removing polyA tails in oligo(dt) selected libraries?Like
RSeQC infer_experiment.py
is used to generate a warning for strandedness fail, I wondered if a similar warning could be created withQualimap:Genomic Origin
orRSeqQC read distribution
when intronic reads are < 10% indicative of polyA selection? And suggest to re-run the pipeline with-a "A{10}"
?Many thanks,
Oliver
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: