Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feature Request; kevinf-patch-0.4.1] Allow adding terms when no annotation table is present #132

Closed
HLWeil opened this issue Mar 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

[Feature Request; kevinf-patch-0.4.1] Allow adding terms when no annotation table is present #132

HLWeil opened this issue Mar 8, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature

Comments

@HLWeil
Copy link
Member

HLWeil commented Mar 8, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The ISA.XLSX assay file contains an additional metadata sheet, where some fields contains ontology annotations as values. These can handily be filled out using the Swate Term picker. Unfortunately the swate tool always expects an annotationTable to be present, which is not the case in the metadata sheet.

Describe the solution you'd like
It would be good to allow the term picker to function regardless of a annotationTable being present in the sheet.
@HLWeil HLWeil added the Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature label Mar 8, 2021
Freymaurer added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2021
@Freymaurer
Enable term search without present annotation table (Issue #132).
37503a5
@Freymaurer
Copy link
Collaborator

Done!

@Freymaurer Freymaurer mentioned this issue Mar 8, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Type: Feature Request This item is confirmed by the maintainers to be a request for a new feature
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@HLWeil @Freymaurer