You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, after extracting the rules according to the rule extraction tool AMIE+ cited in the paper, the rules are much more than what you gave in the paper. How did you deal with it? Do you choose the one with higher confidence? , I hope you can answer, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, after extracting the rules according to the rule extraction tool AMIE+ cited in the paper, the rules are much more than what you gave in the paper. How did you deal with it? Do you choose the one with higher confidence? , I hope you can answer, thank you!
Hello, I want to extract the rules with the tool AMIE+, but I don't konw where to find the code. May I ask you for help? Thank you!
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: ***@***.***>;
发送时间: 2022年4月14日(星期四) 晚上7:25
收件人: ***@***.***>;
抄送: ***@***.***>; ***@***.***>;
主题: Re: [ngl567/RPJE] rule folder? (#7)
Hello, after extracting the rules according to the rule extraction tool AMIE+ cited in the paper, the rules are much more than what you gave in the paper. How did you deal with it? Do you choose the one with higher confidence? , I hope you can answer, thank you!
Hello, I want to extract the rules with the tool AMIE+, but I don't konw where to find the code. May I ask you for help? Thank you!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
Hello, after extracting the rules according to the rule extraction tool AMIE+ cited in the paper, the rules are much more than what you gave in the paper. How did you deal with it? Do you choose the one with higher confidence? , I hope you can answer, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: