Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TEST: Use less confusing function name for testing CLI with --dry-run #424

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

oesteban
Copy link
Member

@oesteban oesteban commented Jan 18, 2024

No description provided.

@oesteban oesteban force-pushed the fix/broken-docs-build branch 2 times, most recently from b5d6349 to e1742fc Compare January 18, 2024 14:19
I believe nbsphinx is tripping when calling pandoc.
The notebook has some latex symbols so I'm adding texlive to the
dependencies installation.

I believe this is the only difference between the local testing
environment I've created and CircleCI.
@effigies effigies changed the title FIX: Confusing function name in test TEST: Use less confusing function name for testing CLI with --dry-run Jan 18, 2024
@effigies effigies merged commit a607eb5 into master Jan 18, 2024
24 checks passed
@effigies effigies deleted the fix/broken-docs-build branch January 18, 2024 18:49
effigies added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
2.8.1 (January 22, 2024)

Bug-fix release in the 2.8.x series.

Fixes doc builds and CLI support for fieldmapless workflows.
Introduces support for BIDS-URIs.

* FIX: Enable fieldmapless by default in CLI (#426)
* FIX: Pandoc requires Texlive to render LaTeX in notebook (#427)
* FIX: New test ``test_wrangler_URIs`` had the wrong oracle (#425)
* ENH: Resolve BIDS-URIs (#349)
* TEST: Use less confusing function name for testing CLI with --dry-run (#424)
* MNT: Bump actions/download-artifact from 3 to 4 (#418)
* MNT: Bump actions/upload-artifact from 3 to 4 (#417)
* CI: Move PR doc build into main doc build, add texlive to build dependencies (#428)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants