Skip to content

Use separate LooseVersion package? #3468

@effigies

Description

@effigies

Based on #3466 it seems like there's scope for multiple projects to do what we've done and end up with mutually incompatible LooseVersions. I can't see a very good reason to be comparing LooseVersions across modules, but even so a single source seems better than many.

I've taken what we did in #3466 and turned it into a package: https://pypi.org/project/looseversion/ (repo: https://github.com/effigies/looseversion)

Should we move to that instead of vendoring it locally?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions