-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 532
[FIX] MultiProc starting workers at dubious wd #2368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bcc25fd
[FIX] MultiProc starting workers at dubious wd
oesteban 70da04e
less verbose, update CHANGES
oesteban 33254fa
Merge branch 'master' into fix/multi-proc-cwd
oesteban 9ebc954
Merge branch 'master' into fix/multi-proc-cwd
oesteban 4db0e7c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into fix/multi-proc-cwd
oesteban a9b2609
add runtime.cwd to report.rst
oesteban 86cac7b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into fix/multi-proc-cwd
oesteban af6c708
sty changes
oesteban 0e2abb1
[skip ci] Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into fix/mul…
oesteban 5b5547b
[skip ci] Merge branch 'fix/multi-proc-cwd' of github.com:oesteban/ni…
oesteban File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this the workflow base directory or the CWD of the shell? Could this cause things to dump into the local directory?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It shouldn't because interfaces handle their WD. I think this is fixing an edge case for fmriprep where we are spinning up and killing workers all the time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok it turns out that some
SimpleInterface
s are writing to the workflow base directory :(There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well that's... suboptimal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's actually bothering, because it means that without this patch, those interfaces are being run in some other unexpected path.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apparently it is a problem only with
SimpleInterface