-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 675
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump bitflags to 0.7 #431
Bump bitflags to 0.7 #431
Conversation
1fbb8c9
to
432ab3f
Compare
Somehow had forgotten the actual bump... This is fixed now and Travis should be happy. |
src/macros.rs
Outdated
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ macro_rules! libc_bitflags { | |||
// (non-pub) Entry rule. | |||
( | |||
$(#[$attr:meta])* | |||
flags $BitFlags:ident: $T:ty { | |||
pub flags $BitFlags:ident: $T:ty { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a (or maybe even the) problem. The macro libc_bitflags
already differentiated between pub and non-pub bitflags (as the comments indicate).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The macro libc_bitflags
was broken because bitflags 0.4
did not support non-public flags.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh wait, misunderstood what you mean. Will fix this.
1.2.0 and 1.7.0 are not supported by bitflags anymore, can we stop supporting them here? No idea what these beta linking failures are though. |
I would not mind dropping support, see #432. I also don't know what the problem on the i686 builds for beta (and nighlty) is. |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #415) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@nox We have dropped support for versions prior to 1.7.0 but are still depending on 1.7.0 for the time being. I would consider dropping 1.7.0 but for now CI depends on it for testing non-host architectures. |
I also opend a bitflags-issue asking whether the drop in support was intentional, though, I have not got an answer, yet. |
1.7 is like an eon old, could we just merge this? |
No, we cannot simply break the current oldest supported version. To merge, we will need to do the additional work to increase the minimum version (including CI updates). |
Yeah of course, that's obvious. Can it be done? |
Yeah, I think we are open to it. The larger chunk of work that needs to be bitten off is further improving the CI infrastructure to allow moving between versions more easily, probably based on https://github.com/japaric/trust. Some discussion here: rust-embedded/wg#16 |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #460) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Recent
|
Can we land this? |
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #515) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
@nox I had forgotten about this and ended up merging #515 which was basically the same change submitted by @SimonSapin. Closing this but thanks for the contribution (and sorry for missing this when going back through the backlog). |
No description provided.