-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Install python packages into venvs across workflows. #640
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 1cf68b5.
ScottTodd
commented
Dec 4, 2024
stbaione
reviewed
Dec 4, 2024
stbaione
reviewed
Dec 4, 2024
stbaione
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2024
marbre
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2024
monorimet
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 13, 2024
Many of these workflows are using persistent self-hosted runners, so it looks like they have been reusing the same system-wide Python environment between workflow runs (plus layer of caching on top). This switches to using venvs at `${{ github.workspace }}/.venv` that should be ephemeral, giving us more explicit control over which packages are installed. More work is planned as part of #584 to refactor these workflows further - replacing the package installs code like `pip install --no-compile -r requirements.txt -r sharktank/requirements-tests.txt -e sharktank/` with a `setup_venv.py` script that uses dev/nightly/stable packages (from an appropriate source). This also disables pip caching, since that is not directly compatible with using venvs. As a result, some workflows are slower now, but they are more predictable in what they install. Good reading for adding caching back: * https://adamj.eu/tech/2023/11/02/github-actions-faster-python-virtual-environments/ * https://github.com/actions/setup-python/blob/main/docs/advanced-usage.md#caching-packages
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Many of these workflows are using persistent self-hosted runners, so it looks like they have been reusing the same system-wide Python environment between workflow runs (plus layer of caching on top). This switches to using venvs at
${{ github.workspace }}/.venv
that should be ephemeral, giving us more explicit control over which packages are installed.More work is planned as part of #584 to refactor these workflows further - replacing the package installs code like
pip install --no-compile -r requirements.txt -r sharktank/requirements-tests.txt -e sharktank/
with asetup_venv.py
script that uses dev/nightly/stable packages (from an appropriate source).This also disables pip caching, since that is not directly compatible with using venvs. As a result, some workflows are slower now, but they are more predictable in what they install. Good reading for adding caching back: