-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
fix: avoid reading files when the size is empty #134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9517b0d
fix: avoid reading files when the size is empty
jimmywarting 68f88e2
also use stat.size for checking if it is modified
jimmywarting dfe7c96
bump minor version number
jimmywarting 568b309
Don't push empty chunks into the array (creates faster reads)
jimmywarting d4632ad
reverted back to avoid making a if check
jimmywarting File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I personally try to treat null and undefined the same in the code, to avoid unexpected behaviour. This also lets us transition to the
??
operator when we drop support for Node.js 12.x, without changing the behaviour of the code.(
x == null
is the same asx === undefined || x === null
)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i know that, i also try to avoid null from time to times. and i can't wait until we can start using
??=
but i wanted to avoid using == instead of === and breaking any compatibility with nullish stuff
also since there is no occurrences of null in the code, then i tought it would be fine to just check for undefined
could also just do
this.originalSize = options.originalSize || options.size
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
options.originalSize || options.size
will useoptions.size
ifoptions.originalSize
is0
though, that's probably not what we wantThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i thought about it too, but after commit 568b309 then that might not be needed after all, cuz 0-sized blob and typedarrays will not be in the source anymore