test: add a test case for compress file into Buffer

[fengmk2]

closes #103

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores

  • Removed the workflow_dispatch trigger from Node.js workflow configurations.

• Tests

  • Added a new test for gzip compression functionality.
  • Reorganized test scripts in package.json for better clarity and execution.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent updates involve refining the GitHub Actions workflows by removing the workflow_dispatch trigger from two configuration files, enhancing the structure of test scripts in package.json, and adding a new gzip compression test in Node.js. These changes streamline the development process and expand testing capabilities.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
.github/workflows/...	Removed workflow_dispatch trigger from nodejs.yml and release.yml, also removed checkTest from release.yml.
package.json	Updated test scripts: split ts-test into test:ts and test:js, adjusted ci script.
test/gzip/file_stream.test.js	Added test for compressing a file into a Buffer using gzip.

🐇💻✨
Oh hoppy day for code and play,
With tests that split and workflows sway.
Gzip streams compress, oh what a fest,
A rabbit's joy in code expressed!
🎉📜🐾

---

Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1112123 and d25ab8a.

Files selected for processing (4)

• .github/workflows/nodejs.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/release.yml (1 hunks)
• package.json (1 hunks)
• test/gzip/file_stream.test.js (2 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• .github/workflows/nodejs.yml

Additional comments not posted (3)

.github/workflows/release.yml (1)

4-13: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-10]

Verify the impact of removing the workflow_dispatch trigger and the checkTest parameter.

Ensure that the removal of these features aligns with your project's workflow requirements and does not inadvertently reduce necessary checks or flexibility in the release process.

package.json (1)

8-14: LGTM! The reorganization of test scripts enhances modularity and clarity.

Ensure that the CI environment is correctly configured to handle these changes without issues.

test/gzip/file_stream.test.js (1)

37-48: LGTM! The new test case correctly implements the functionality for compressing a file into a Buffer using gzip.

Consider adding more detailed assertions to verify the contents of the compressed file to ensure that the compression was performed correctly.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.