-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Node.js Foundation Core Technical Committee (CTC) Meeting 2017-08-30 #171
Comments
Reminder that I'm on vacation all next week and @mhdawson will be chairing this meeting. |
There are six items labeled
|
It might be possible I will not be able to join, as I am traveling in an unfavorable timezone. The current problem is that there seems no consensus on nodejs/node#445 (comment). The streams WG thinks the best path forward is to add new properties to the classes (b solution), but @mscdex (and maybe others) objects that as it will pollute all descendants. If we want nodejs/node#445 solved, we need to pick a path forward. |
I won't be joining, I'll be on the road at the time of the call. I haven't had time to work on nodejs/node#13784. I suggest taking it off the agenda unless there is anything new to discuss. It was discussed last time but not untagged afterwards. An emphatic -1 to #165 and, by $deity, let it be the last time this affair comes up. No strong opinion on the other issues. nodejs/node#445 and nodejs/vm#9 don't seem objectionable to me and I don't quite understand why nodejs/node#12857 is controversial. |
I'm still looking for a volunteer to stream. |
@Fishrock123 Are you likely to be able to make this meeting? |
I can volunteer but I'm not sure what are the technical requirements |
@targos There are two markdown documents in https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/tree/master/Streaming that hopefully answer the question. Otherwise, Rod and Jeremiah are the two folks who usually do it, so you can ask them if you have questions. |
I believe we will also have to discuss nodejs/TSC#317 in some form.
I should be able to, yes. |
There have been no objections raised in regards nodejs/TSC#317. Given that fact, I believe we can simply proceed with landing that PR and assuming that the decision is complete. There's no need to discuss things that are not contentious. |
I think for posterity it should at least be mentioned at the start of the meeting. Should we mark this as a TSC meeting and not a CTC meeting? Or both this week? |
I have updated the invite list to include @joshgav as a TSC member rather than an observer, and have updated the We should mark this as a TSC meeting. There's no point in having both. |
I worry that may cause some confusion for people not so in-tune what is going on. |
@mhdawson let us know if you need anyone from @nodejs/n-api to drop in to discuss nodejs/vm#9. Both myself and @aruneshchandra are available if you need us. |
Please read my statement in #165 if you haven't already done so and are planning on submitting a vote in this meeting. If you are voting based on factors separate to those stated in the post or those not covered by my statement then I would appreciate the chance to speak to those factors. |
@digitalinfinity can you chime in on nodejs/node#14902 (related to nodejs/vm#9) to fill in how the discussion went on CS modules. |
@mhdawson done |
Time
UTC Wed 30-Aug-2017 16:00 (04:00 PM):
Or in your local time:
Links
Agenda
Extracted from ctc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.
nodejs/node
_writableState
and_readableState
access across codebase #445nodejs/vm
nodejs/CTC
Invited
Observers
Notes
The agenda comes from issues labelled with
ctc-agenda
across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.Joining the meeting
Uberconference; participants should have the link & numbers, contact me if you don't.
Public participation
We stream our conference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live, it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.
Many of us will be on IRC in #node-dev on Freenode if you'd like to interact, we have a Q/A session scheduled at the end of the meeting if you'd like us to discuss anything in particular. @nodejs/collaborators in particular if there's anything you need from the CTC that's not worth putting on as a separate agenda item, this is a good place for it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: