-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 570
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bringing back regular meetings #333
Comments
+1 |
Bump @nodejs/release |
ping @nodejs/release |
+1 There's one issue over in nodejs/node tagged with the |
@MylesBorins should we just schedule a meeting to get started? |
Another PR with lts-agenda tag: nodejs/node#22633 |
@MylesBorins are you still in favor or restarting regular meetings? @BethGriggs if @MylesBorins answers yes would you be able to volunteer to help choose a time and setup the meeting (I can help with adding to Node.js calendar etc.) |
I am very +1 on starting this up again
…On Mon, Sep 24, 2018, 3:28 PM Michael Dawson ***@***.***> wrote:
@MylesBorins <https://github.com/MylesBorins> are you still in favor or
restarting regular meetings? @BethGriggs <https://github.com/BethGriggs>
if @MylesBorins <https://github.com/MylesBorins> answers yes would you be
able to volunteer to help choose a time and setup the meeting (I can help
with adding to Node.js calendar etc.)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#333 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecVyR7qN6N_HfHa9PJSJNb12X9lrblks5ueTJlgaJpZM4Ts91x>
.
|
I am +1 as well |
Initially thinking of meeting every two weeks? I set up a doodle to start to try and find a regular day/time for us to meet - https://doodle.com/poll/95b6f5zdgxzy75n9 @nodejs/release |
@nodejs/release looks like we could use more people to fill in the doodle. |
Ping @nodejs/release |
Don't let my awkward timezone be a blocker for finding a good slot. I think the majority of folks here are close to UTC or in US East and you have lots of potential slots. |
I am also +1 for meetings. The doodle is outdated, so I did not fill it out. I believe it's best to open up a new and smaller one which contains exactly one week which we use as reference for all weeks? |
I have alternating bi weekly meetings. So imho it does make sense to have
two weeks on the doodle.
…On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 9:03 AM Ruben Bridgewater ***@***.*** wrote:
I am also +1 for meetings.
The doodle is outdated, so I did not fill it out. I believe it's best to
open up a new and smaller one which contains exactly one week which we use
as reference for all weeks?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#333 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV4rfVOluD2m9DpZVGwKmomwJaBIlks5u37tIgaJpZM4Ts91x>
.
|
Alternatively, does anyone object to 11 ET on Thursdays?
(Figured if we can all agree on that time perhaps we don't need to do a
doodle)
…On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 9:09 AM Myles Borins ***@***.*** wrote:
I have alternating bi weekly meetings. So imho it does make sense to have
two weeks on the doodle.
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018, 9:03 AM Ruben Bridgewater ***@***.***
wrote:
> I am also +1 for meetings.
>
> The doodle is outdated, so I did not fill it out. I believe it's best to
> open up a new and smaller one which contains exactly one week which we use
> as reference for all weeks?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#333 (comment)>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAecV4rfVOluD2m9DpZVGwKmomwJaBIlks5u37tIgaJpZM4Ts91x>
> .
>
|
11 ET is OK for me, if we start in January |
3am for me, I'm not quite that excited, so it's a no for me |
11 ET on Thursdays would be fine for me. But since that does not work for @rvagg maybe we could move it either three hours earlier or three hours later (while I could not participate well three hours later). |
don't bother, ET + Europe makes it tough to include APAC |
Based on the above I'd like to propose we have a first meeting on the 17th and meet biweekly afterwards |
I've added it to the Calendar and the Zoom |
They are back! |
I think that moving to no longer having meetings was a good idea at the time, but a few things have shifted since then and it feels like there is a need for some sort of regular cadence sync.
Would people be open to spinning up a monthly meeting for the WG?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: