Meeting16sep

meetings/2020-09-16.md

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+# Node.js Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2020-09-16
+
+
+## Links
+
+* **Recording**:  https://youtu.be/oh3fNmediRk
+* **GitHub Issue** :https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/922
+
+## Present
+
+* Beth Griggs @BethGriggs (TSC)
+* Ruben Bridgewater @BridgeAR (TSC)
+* Colin Ihrig @cjihrig (TSC)
+* Shelley Vohr @codebytere (TSC)
+* Gabriel Schulhof @gabrielschulhof (TSC)
+* Gireesh Punathil @gireeshpunathil (TSC)
+* James Snell @jasnell (TSC)
+* Matteo Collina @mcollina (TSC)
+* Michael Dawson @mhdawson (TSC)
+* Myles Borins @MylesBorins (TSC)
+* Michaël Zasso @targos (TSC)
+* Tobias Nießen @tniessen (TSC)
+
+## Agenda
+
+### Announcements
+
+* Bethany - security releases went out yesterday please update when you can
+
+### CPC and Board Meeting Updates
+
+*Extracted from **tsc-agenda** labeled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting.
+
+* No updates from Board 
+  * No updates on the CPC front.
+
+### nodejs/node
+
+
+* doc: add technical values document [#35145](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35145)
+  * as FYI, will remove from agenda
+
+* doc: change requirements for objection dismissal [#35037](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35037)
+  * Discussion around the bigger problem
+  * On the specific issue
+    * Matteo objects, but adding “unless the objector marks their objection as final”
+    * Ruben, this addresses a common case where the objection is non-responsive at all
+      after raising the initial objection.
+
+  * Talked about fast track, TSC members more autonomously can remove objections
+    * James will take a stab on alternative approach.
+
+* util: add util.parseArgs() [#35015](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/35015)
+  * 
+
+* doc: drop minimum waiting time as hard guideline [#33879](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/33879)
+  * James, proposal by Anna, following contribution survey
+  * objections in thread that it makes is more difficult for people internationally 
+  * compromise proposal -> 
+       Reduce the current time limits to 24 hours with two sign offs, at least one of which is from
+       relevant CODEOWNERS team, or 72 hours with one sign off.
+  * however, objections have not weighed in.
+  * Agreement was to open issue in TSC repo with proposed resolution (option 3 along audit of code owners), unless there are objections  in 1week we will go with that.  Michael has action to open that issue.
+
+* Rename default branch from "master" to "main" or something similar [#33864](https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/33864)
+  * no time skipped for this week
+
+* process: Change default --unhandled-rejections=throw [#33021](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/33021)
+  * no time skipped for this week, although we don’t think there is anything to discuss anyway
+
+* fs: simplify copy operations and more cleanups [#31038](https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31038)
+  * no time skipped for this week, Ruben commented that it can wait until next week
+
+### nodejs/TSC
+
+* Voting on the default behavior for Promise unhandled rejections [#916](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/916)
+   * no time skipped for this week, although we don’t think there is anything to discuss anyway
+
+### nodejs/admin
+
+* Audit Google account access [#389](https://github.com/nodejs/admin/issues/389)
+  * no update.
+
+## Strategic Initiatives
+* ran out of time, no review this week.
+
+## Upcoming Meetings
+
+
+* **Node.js Foundation Calendar**: https://nodejs.org/calendar
+
+
+Click `+GoogleCalendar` at the bottom right to add to your own Google calendar.