Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: migrate to ESM #542

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2024
Merged

refactor: migrate to ESM #542

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

targos
Copy link
Member

@targos targos commented Jul 22, 2024

No description provided.

@targos targos requested a review from a team as a code owner July 22, 2024 21:43
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jul 22, 2024

LGTM. Is there a case to be made for landing #541 first, since it's a smaller/more focused change?

@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Jul 28, 2024

LGTM. Is there a case to be made for landing #541 first, since it's a smaller/more focused change?

That PR is only useful if we don't migrate to ESM, so I think not (unfortunately). But feel free to merge it if you'd like to acknowledge the contribution and I'll add a revert commit to this PR.

@Trott Trott merged commit 4a14a01 into nodejs:main Jul 30, 2024
3 checks passed
@targos targos deleted the esm branch July 30, 2024 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants