Merge pull request #4 from mhdawson/minutesJul29

doc: add minutes for meeting 29 Jul 2020

meetings/2020-07-29.md

@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+# Node.js  Next 10 Years team Meeting 2020-07-29
+
+## Links
+
+
+* **Recording**: https://youtu.be/5vpZzMRj4m0
+* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/nodejs/next-10/issues/3
+
+## Present
+
+* Michael Dawson (@mhdawson)
+* Wes Todd (@wesleytodd)
+* Andrey Pechkurov (@puzpuzpuz)
+* Beth Griggs (@BethGriggs)
+* @mmarchini
+* Divy Tolia (@designmoreweb)
+* Joe Sepi (@joesepi)
+* Chengzhong Wu (@legendecas)
+* Jean Burellier (@sheplu)
+
+## Agenda
+
+## Announcements
+
+*Extracted from **next10-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting.
+
+### nodejs/next-10
+
+* Values/directions document for core [#2](https://github.com/nodejs/next-10/issues/2)
+  * From discussion in the meeting today lets start with the name for the file being `mission.md`
+  * Values Brainstorm, initial list:
+    * version from html spec as one example: https://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-constituencies
+    * Values should be a general suggestion, not a hard rule
+    * Wes, this is around technical values, other values are important but not covered here. Make sure to clarify that up front.
+    * Approachability (both technical and community)
+    * Stability
+    * User experience
+    * Developer experience
+    * Community
+    * Security
+    * Backwards compatibility(?)
+    * Performance
+    * Diagnostics
+    * Maintainability
+    * Web API compatibility
+    * Ecosystem (from FunRetro)
+    * Collaborator Velocity
+    * Great Documentation
+    * Adoption of new technologies
+    * Simplicity over complexity
+    * Planning for today versus all possible future options, Avoid needless complexity
+    * Tight focus/minimal surface 
+      * Same as small core? - was trying to capture without saying that :)
+      * “Right sized core”? I think we want to have a discussion around the balance between
+        “small” and still providing the most value
+    * LTS support for users still using older versions of Node
+      * Clear expectations set around support? 
+      * Yes, also for people who use different flavors of linux or other operating systems less popular than windows, mac and ubuntu 
+        * I think that falls more under supported platforms
+    * Suitability for cloud/deployments?
+    * Suitability for IoT (e.g. low memory footprint)?
+
+*  We should make a clear list of constituencies, brainstormed list:
+  * Direct end users
+    * Users who run tools themselves (install Node, run tool, deal with errors)
+  * Application operators  
+  * Application Developers
+    * front-end tool consumers
+    * back-end server authors
+    * hobby developers
+    * professional developers
+    * tool authors
+  * library/package authors
+  * Node.js core maintainers
+
+* Next steps
+  * Open PR to capture constituencies in repo (Matheus) 
+  * Open issue with values and ask people to comment on their ranking of priorities, and tag for
+    the agenda for next time. (Michael)
+
+## Q&A, Other
+
+
+## Upcoming Meetings
+
+
+NOTE: had to see the time for the next meeting to 10-11 EST (same as this time) as the other
+2 TSC timeslots already have a meeting scheduled during that week.
+
+
+* **Node.js Foundation Calendar**: https://nodejs.org/calendar
+
+
+Click `+GoogleCalendar` at the bottom right to add to your own Google calendar.