Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v5.0.3 proposal #1829

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

v5.0.3 proposal #1829

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Jul 16, 2019

A proposal for a patch release once #1828 is merged. This drops #1811 because it's a semver-major. What I'd like to do is rebase master on top of this once the release is out to avoid (defer?) creating a branch to manage this. It will change the hash of that commit and #1828 when it lands. If anyone objects to this then I guess we can go ahead and make a v5.x branch, I'd just prefer to not add that level of complication while we don't need it.

  • [66ad305775] - python: accept Python 3 conditionally (João Reis) #1815
  • [7e7fce3fed] - python: move Python detection to its own file (João Reis) #1815
  • [e40c99e283] - src: implement standard.js linting (Rod Vagg) #1794
  • [bb92c761a9] - test: add Node.js 6 on Windows to Travis CI (João Reis) #1812
  • [7fd924079f] - test: increase tap timeout (João Reis) #1812
  • [7e8127068f] - test: cover supported node versions with travis (Rod Vagg) #1809
  • [24109148df] - test: downgrade to tap@^12 for continued Node 6 support (Rod Vagg) #1808
  • [656117cc4a] - win: make VS path match case-insensitive (João Reis) #1806

@cclauss
Copy link
Contributor

cclauss commented Jul 16, 2019

My sense is that we should have #1826 and #1827 flattened before a release.

@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Jul 16, 2019

I don't think #1829 is our problem and we don't have a PR for #1826 yet. There's a little urgency to this release because we broke ecosystem things with 2761afb, see nodejs/node#28647 (comment), so I'd like to get this out sooner than later. 5.0.2 made it into an npm release unfortunately so it'd be nice to catch the next update with a new 5.0.3.

Copy link
Member

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I merged #1828 just now.

@rvagg rvagg closed this Jul 17, 2019
@rvagg rvagg deleted the rvagg/v5.0.3-proposal branch July 17, 2019 04:33
@rvagg
Copy link
Member Author

rvagg commented Jul 17, 2019

published, two commits were reordered, I'll note in their PRs what the new hashes are

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants