Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 22, 2023. It is now read-only.

readline completions after Control-Z #3295

Closed
josher19 opened this issue May 21, 2012 · 2 comments
Closed

readline completions after Control-Z #3295

josher19 opened this issue May 21, 2012 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@josher19
Copy link

Sending a script to the background with CTRL-Z (SIGTSTP) and bringing it back to the foreground will result in readline completions behaving strangely.

Related: #2757

There is a simple work-around for node v6.7 :

var tty=require('tty');
tty.setRawMode(false); 
tty.setRawMode(true);

Need to do both. Just doing tty.setRawMode(true) does not fix the problem.

Hopefully this simple fix will also work on node v7.

However, this sometimes results in characters getting echoed to the terminal twice
in some libraries that rely on readline (such as CoffeeScript and LiveScript).

Example of problem & solution:

joshua@jsw-desktop:~$ node
> var tty=require('tty')
undefined
> reset = function() { tty.setRawMode(false); tty.setRawMode(true); }
[Function]
> // hit Ctrl-Z
undefined
> 
[1]+  Stopped                 node
joshua@jsw-desktop:~$ # resume process
joshua@jsw-desktop:~$ fg
node


undefined
> ^P
> // hit Ctrl-Z^N
> ^P^P^P
> // hit Ctrl-Z^P^P
> reset = function() { tty.setRawMode(false); tty.setRawMode(true); }^N
> // hit Ctrl-Z^N
> reset()
reset()
undefined
> // now ^N (next line) and ^P (previous line) work normally
@piscisaureus
Copy link

@TooTallNate ?

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Member

Confirmed. Happens with master, too.

It's kind of expected: suspending the process and returning control to the shell clobbers the terminal settings. The problem is that SIGSTP and SIGCONT cannot be caught or (reliably) detected.

A workaround is to have the REPL install a check watcher that resets the terminal after each tick of the event loop. That's kind of hackish, though.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants