Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
doc: document flow for supporting type generation
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Refs: nodejs/next-10#104

Add initial doc to capture how the project supports
the flow for types generation. Based on discussions
from the Next-10 mini-summit that included project
members and members of the Definitely Typed team.

Will need to be updated as we improve the flow and
resulting json but captures the current flow and
approach and will give us the place where we can
update as things change.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson <mdawson@devrus.com>

PR-URL: #41464
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
  • Loading branch information
mhdawson authored and danielleadams committed Mar 3, 2022
1 parent 4a92b0f commit 36ccb62
Showing 1 changed file with 63 additions and 0 deletions.
63 changes: 63 additions & 0 deletions doc/contributing/maintaining-types-for-nodejs.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
# Maintaining types for Node.js

While JavaScript is an untyped language, there are a number of complementary
technologies like [TypeScript](https://www.typescriptlang.org/) and
[Flow](https://flow.org/) which allow developers to use types within their
JavaScript projects. While many people don't use types, there are enough
who do that the project has agreed it's important to work towards having
[suitable types for end-users](https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/doc/contributing/technical-priorities.md#suitable-types-for-end-users).

## High level approach

There are a number of ways that types could be maintained for Node.js ranging
from shipping them with the Node.js runtime to having them be externally
maintained.

The different options were discussed as part of the
[next-10](https://github.com/nodejs/next-10/blob/main/meetings/summit-nov-2021.md#suitable-types-for-end-users)
effort and it was agreed that maintaining them externally is the best approach.
Some of the advantages to this approach include:

* Node.js maintainers do not need to be familiar with any given type
system/technology.
* Types can be updated without requiring Node.js releases.

The agreement was that the ideal flow would be as follows:

* APIs are added/documented in the existing Node.js markdown files.
* Automation in the Node.js project creates a machine readable JSON
representation of the API from the documentation.
* Automation within external type projects consumes the JSON and automatically
generates a PR to add the API.

## Generation/Consumption of machine readable JSON files

When you run `make doc` the canonical markdown files used to
document the Node.js APIs in the
[doc/api](https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/master/doc/api)
directory are converted to both an `.html` file and a `.json` file.

As part of the regular build/release process both the `html` and
`json` files are published to [nodejs.org](https://nodejs.org/en/docs/).

The generator that does the conversion is in the
[tools/doc](https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/master/tools/doc)
directory.

## Markdown structure

The constraints required on the markdown files in the
[doc/api](https://github.com/nodejs/node/tree/master/doc/api) directory
in order to be able to generate the JSON files are defined in the
[documentation-style-guide](https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/doc/README.md#documentation-style-guide).

## Planned changes (as of Jan 1 2022)

While JSON files are already being generated and published, they are not
structured well enough for them to be easily consumed by the type projects.
Generally external teams need some custom scripts along with manual fixup
afterwards.

There is an ongoing effort to add additional markdown constraints and
then update the flow in order to be able to generate a better
JSON output.

0 comments on commit 36ccb62

Please sign in to comment.