-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nodejs v7.10.1 broken on CentOS 5. Error: "node: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by node)" #14182
Comments
@nodejs/build @nodejs/release |
I think you should install glibc? |
@XadillaX A new version of glibc should not be a requirement for a security (patch level) release. |
@ronkorving In principle, I agree. However...see discussion at #12672. CentOS 5 went EOL (from the vendor) in March. If I'm reading that conversation right, it means that new releases of Node.js, even patch level ones, are not guaranteed to run there anymore. |
The thing is though there aren't going to be many more v7.x releases (v7.10.1 might be the last one even), so I don't see how it could hurt to just use the same glibc throughout v7.x. |
I agree, but I'm not the one doing releases and maintaining the infrastructure, so I feel like my opinion counts for less because there may be issues I am not sensitive to. Moreover, 7.x isn't really the issue. It's 6.x, which will be supporting until April 2019. I suspect the breakage/upgrade/whatever-you-want-to-call-it happened there too. This is unexpected and likely frustrating for users. At a minimum, we probably should find a place to repeat the text added in #12672 where it will be more visible. Maybe the README.md file. The README file refers to that file for the list of supported platforms, but it is arguably kind of hidden by virtue of being in the "Building Node.js" section. Like, @tokyowizard probably didn't think to look under "Building Node.js" and why would they? They're not building Node.js and the previous downloaded version worked just fine. From the end user perspective, why wouldn't and shouldn't this patch release be expected to work? We should put the information (that it might not work) somewhere that they might find it when they go looking for it. |
That information should probably have been in the "notable changes" section of the release post. |
@Trott Yeah, I think for most people a new Node release is just an Speaking of which, this is where I would expect an explicit mention when a platform (or glibc version) is no longer supported. It's the first place where I as a user would look. (update: Ah, @targos just made the same point, I didn't hit refresh in my browser yet :)) |
So technically CentOS 5 hasn't been supported since Node 4. However I don't think we make this in any way visible (it's only in In this situation I believe this is a bug with the release scripts, @rvagg added this crazy if expression to run on CentOS 5 For Node 7 and below, and CentOS 6 for Node 8 and above: if [[ \
$OSTYPE =~ linux && \
$ARCH =~ x86_64|x64|i386|x86|ia32 && \
( \
( ${NODE_VERSION:0:1} -gt "7" && ! $NODE_LABELS =~ post-8-release ) || \
( ${NODE_VERSION:0:1} -lt "7" && $NODE_LABELS =~ post-8-release ) \
) \
]]; then
echo "Not building Node.js ${NODE_VERSION:0:1} on $NODE_NAME"
exit 0
fi I'm pretty sure it should be |
cc/ @nodejs/build , can anyone confirm that my suggestion is correct? |
@nodejs/build - please see @gibfahn's comment. I'm closing this out as the bug report is against v7.x and that's out of support. |
Version v.7.10.1 no longer works on CentOS 5.
Nodejs 7 versions have been working up until 7.10.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: