-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thrown an Error from queueMicrotask's callback aborted the process #30080
Labels
async_hooks
Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem.
confirmed-bug
Issues with confirmed bugs.
Comments
addaleax
added
confirmed-bug
Issues with confirmed bugs.
domain
Issues and PRs related to the domain subsystem.
async_hooks
Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem.
and removed
domain
Issues and PRs related to the domain subsystem.
labels
Oct 23, 2019
addaleax
added a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this issue
Oct 23, 2019
We clear the async id stack inside the uncaught exception handler and emit `after` events in the process, so we should not emit `after` a second time from the `runInAsyncScope()` code. This should match the behaviour we have in C++. Fixes: nodejs#30080
3 tasks
Thanks, #30087 should fix this :) |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2019
We clear the async id stack inside the uncaught exception handler and emit `after` events in the process, so we should not emit `after` a second time from the `runInAsyncScope()` code. This should match the behaviour we have in C++. Fixes: #30080 PR-URL: #30087 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2019
We clear the async id stack inside the uncaught exception handler and emit `after` events in the process, so we should not emit `after` a second time from the `runInAsyncScope()` code. This should match the behaviour we have in C++. Fixes: #30080 PR-URL: #30087 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 10, 2019
We clear the async id stack inside the uncaught exception handler and emit `after` events in the process, so we should not emit `after` a second time from the `runInAsyncScope()` code. This should match the behaviour we have in C++. Fixes: #30080 PR-URL: #30087 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 10, 2019
We clear the async id stack inside the uncaught exception handler and emit `after` events in the process, so we should not emit `after` a second time from the `runInAsyncScope()` code. This should match the behaviour we have in C++. Fixes: #30080 PR-URL: #30087 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2019
We clear the async id stack inside the uncaught exception handler and emit `after` events in the process, so we should not emit `after` a second time from the `runInAsyncScope()` code. This should match the behaviour we have in C++. Fixes: #30080 PR-URL: #30087 Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
async_hooks
Issues and PRs related to the async hooks subsystem.
confirmed-bug
Issues with confirmed bugs.
Version:
v12.13.0
Subsystem:
global
Platform:
Linux rankong-wacai-env 4.9.125-linuxkit #1 SMP Fri Sep 7 08:20:28 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Darwin RanWithMeow-RMPB 18.7.0 Darwin Kernel Version 18.7.0: Tue Aug 20 16:57:14 PDT 2019; root:xnu-4903.271.2~2/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: