-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node Foundation CTC Meeting 2015-10-28 #3561
Comments
Should we be using |
Out at a conference, won't be able to make it this week. |
Sorry, I can't attend the meeting this week. |
What are the chances of me attending as an observer? |
This was discussed offline, no need to respond here. |
Audio now available @ https://soundcloud.com/node-foundation/ctc-meeting-2015-10-28 |
@nodejs/collaborators note that we now have a Also note that I've cleaned up and published my agenda generating tool so you can use it to help organise your working group meetings if you need it. See [here] for details. It does this kind of thing, fetching issues from across all repos in the nodejs org:
|
Then why do we call it as "Technical Steering Committee"? |
@rvagg Looks like you may have omitted a link. |
re: #3561 (comment), I find the CTC/TSC split confusing. I can kindof see the goal, I guess it was to distinguish somehow between overall Node.js steering, and the nodejs/node repo steering, but the terms still seem muddled across the docs. Some questions:
/to @mikeal |
Yes, the membership is currently identical but will diverge as we bring on
|
To expand, @sam-github:
Right
Not at all. Just a matter of mechanics. It's anticipated that over the next few months the CTC will probably not change much (I'd still like to expand it further) but the TSC will trim down as it starts having meetings and focuses on non-technical matters that would bore and/or frustrate some of the existing members who really don't want to be involved in that kind of bikeshedding. The TSC will also expand as it the list of top-level projects (TLPs), either from what we have now in the org or new projects coming in. I think that it's set up so that its membership is exclusively made up of representatives of TLPs.
We've tentatively reserved the slot after the current CTC meeting for the TSC meeting, I'm not sure if we've had any meetings yet (I don't recall being in one anyway).
Probably. It's also unresolved how it should be documented on the nodejs/node README, should that list just the CTC or the TSC also? My guess is that it'll become more clear over time as we do some actual business.
Matters to be resolved. It's so early that nothing much has really changed. As the membership of the two groups diverge and the business they attend to differ it'll clear up. Also, this process is not set in stone, there's lots of discussion to be had so if you have concerns or more questions then feel free to fire away and hopefully answers can be found. |
OK, @rvagg that answers my questions, including the meta-question of why this isn't clearer in the READMEs (because its a WIP). But I see the direction we are going, thank you. |
Time
UTC Wed 28-Oct-2015 20:00:
Or in your local time:
Links
Agenda
Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.
nodejs/node
nodejs/TSC
Invited
Notes
The agenda comes from issues labelled with
tsc-agenda
across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts. I'm using a tool to fetch the list so it's not a big deal to collate.Joining the meeting
Uberconference; participants should have the link & numbers, contact me if you don't.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: