-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking issue for Fastify regressions #49600
Comments
A few notes that we have already fixed a few problems that broke Fastify, so this is not relatively new: |
cc @ShogunPanda |
I don't think this is related to |
Most of those issues are caused by #49344. However even after disabling code coverage, CITGM is still failing: https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/3272/. This might be partially due to some of our CITGM machines, but it's something that should be investigated. |
Currently, Fastify tests are failing on v20 on CITGM.
https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js-citgm/job/citgm-smoker/3224/nodes=fedora-latest-x64/testReport/junit/(root)/citgm/fastify_v4_22_2/
The tests that are failing to shut down the process are:
The test passes, but it times out when it's trying to shut down the process.
This might be due to changes in the keep-alive logic in v20. It's entirely possible that those changes unveiled some bugs elsewhere, but we are having a hard time investigating this because it happens only in CI.
The other option is that it's a bug in the testing harness (tap), or coverage collection.
This might be the case because we are seeing some flaky tests in CITGM too: https://github.com/nodejs/citgm/actions/runs/6143382259/job/16666721399#step:14:618.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: