-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some way of not displaying skipped or filtered tests in the spec test reporter #51383
Labels
feature request
Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js.
test_runner
Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.
Comments
domenic
added
the
feature request
Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js.
label
Jan 5, 2024
benjamingr
added
the
test_runner
Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.
label
Jan 5, 2024
@nodejs/test_runner not displaying filtered out tests seems reasonable to me wdyt? |
I think filtering tests and running |
Should it not be displayed only in the spec reporter? |
cjihrig
added a commit
to cjihrig/node
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2024
This commit updates the test runner to suppress any output for filtered tests. Filtered tests no longer generate reporter events, and the unfiltered tests are renumbered in the output as though the filtered tests were not present. Skipped tests that are not filtered are still included in the output. This change is particularly useful when filtering a large number of tests, as the previously displayed skip output could be distracting. Fixes: nodejs#51383
cjihrig
added a commit
to cjihrig/node
that referenced
this issue
Mar 26, 2024
This commit updates the test runner to suppress any output for filtered tests. Filtered tests no longer generate reporter events, and the unfiltered tests are renumbered in the output as though the filtered tests were not present. Skipped tests that are not filtered are still included in the output. This change is particularly useful when filtering a large number of tests, as the previously displayed skip output could be distracting. Fixes: nodejs#51383
nodejs-github-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 28, 2024
This commit updates the test runner to suppress any output for filtered tests. Filtered tests no longer generate reporter events, and the unfiltered tests are renumbered in the output as though the filtered tests were not present. Skipped tests that are not filtered are still included in the output. This change is particularly useful when filtering a large number of tests, as the previously displayed skip output could be distracting. Fixes: #51383 PR-URL: #52221 Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz.nizipli@sentry.io> Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <moshe@atlow.co.il>
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
I apologize for my oversight, the information in that comment is incorrect. I'm sorry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request
Issues that request new features to be added to Node.js.
test_runner
Issues and PRs related to the test runner subsystem.
What is the problem this feature will solve?
In jsdom, we have 4187 tests. Sometimes I would like to run only a few of them, so I experimented with
--test-name-pattern="dom/events"
to only run tests under mydom/events
suite.The result was that I saw 4100+ lines of skipped tests, within which there was somewhere buried ~50 lines of passing tests. This was not a great experience.
Compare this with Mocha, where using
--fgrep="dom/events"
only reports tests that match the pattern.What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?
I see basically two ways to solve this:
Treat filtered-out tests differently from skipped tests. For example, the totals displayed at the bottom of the test report could exclude filtered-out tests entirely. (This is how Mocha behaves.)
Provide some way of not displaying skipped tests when using the spec reporter. E.g.,
--test-show-skipped=false
or something.The former would be better for me, because sometimes I actually have tests marked as long-term skipped, and I'd like to see those even when I'm filtering. E.g. if I have 50
dom/events
tests, of which 3 are skipped, running with--test-name-pattern="dom/events"
would ideally show 47 passes and 3 skipped. If we filtered away all skipped tests, then it would show only the 47 passes.The latter would probably be easier to implement, and fit better with how the test runner currently works.
What alternatives have you considered?
I could write my own reporter, I guess.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: