test: fix timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted #10362
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Trott
added
test
nodejs-github-bot
added
test
test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted was flaky under load because there is no guarantee that a timer will fire within a given period of time. It had an exit handler that checked that the process was finishing in less than twice as much as a timer was set for. Under load, the timer could take over 200ms to fire even if it was set for 100ms, so this was causing the test to be flaky on CI from time to time. However, that timing check is unnecessary to identify the regression that the test was written for. When run with a version of Node.js that does not contain the fix that accompanied the test in its initial commit, an assertion indicating that there were still timers in the active timer list fired. So, this commit removes the exit handler timing check and relies on the existing robust active timers list length check. This allows us to move the test back to parallel because it does not seem to fail under load anymore. The test was refactored slightly, removing duplicated code to a function, using `assert.strictEqual()` instead of `assert.equal()`, changing a 10ms timer to 1ms, and improving the messages provided by assertions. Fixes: nodejs#8459
Trott
force-pushed
the
fix-flaky-timers-test
branch
from
710ea4c
to
16c7a54
Compare
|
@nodejs/testing @erinspice |
|
The version of the test run with Node v6.3.1 which does not have the fix (so the test should fail): $ node -v
v6.3.1
$ node test/parallel/test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted.js
assert.js:89
throw new assert.AssertionError({
^
AssertionError: Timers remain.
at Immediate.<anonymous> (/Users/trott/io.js/test/parallel/test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted.js:42:16)
at Immediate.<anonymous> (/Users/trott/io.js/test/common.js:419:15)
at runCallback (timers.js:570:20)
at tryOnImmediate (timers.js:550:5)
at processImmediate [as _immediateCallback] (timers.js:529:5)
$ |
|
Once ubuntu1610-x64 is available to stress test jobs, it would be good to get a stress test of 9999 runs on that platform for this PR. EDIT: stress test |
Fishrock123
approved these changes
Dec 21, 2016
|
CI had some issues yesterday that resulted in this CI job being lost. It was all green, I'm pretty sure, but let's do it again: CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5511/ |
jasnell
approved these changes
Dec 22, 2016
Trott
added a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 23, 2016
test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted was flaky under load because there is no guarantee that a timer will fire within a given period of time. It had an exit handler that checked that the process was finishing in less than twice as much as a timer was set for. Under load, the timer could take over 200ms to fire even if it was set for 100ms, so this was causing the test to be flaky on CI from time to time. However, that timing check is unnecessary to identify the regression that the test was written for. When run with a version of Node.js that does not contain the fix that accompanied the test in its initial commit, an assertion indicating that there were still timers in the active timer list fired. So, this commit removes the exit handler timing check and relies on the existing robust active timers list length check. This allows us to move the test back to parallel because it does not seem to fail under load anymore. The test was refactored slightly, removing duplicated code to a function, using `assert.strictEqual()` instead of `assert.equal()`, changing a 10ms timer to 1ms, and improving the messages provided by assertions. Fixes: nodejs#8459 PR-URL: nodejs#10362 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
Landed in 4bdf494 |
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2017
test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted was flaky under load because there is no guarantee that a timer will fire within a given period of time. It had an exit handler that checked that the process was finishing in less than twice as much as a timer was set for. Under load, the timer could take over 200ms to fire even if it was set for 100ms, so this was causing the test to be flaky on CI from time to time. However, that timing check is unnecessary to identify the regression that the test was written for. When run with a version of Node.js that does not contain the fix that accompanied the test in its initial commit, an assertion indicating that there were still timers in the active timer list fired. So, this commit removes the exit handler timing check and relies on the existing robust active timers list length check. This allows us to move the test back to parallel because it does not seem to fail under load anymore. The test was refactored slightly, removing duplicated code to a function, using `assert.strictEqual()` instead of `assert.equal()`, changing a 10ms timer to 1ms, and improving the messages provided by assertions. Fixes: #8459 PR-URL: #10362 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 4, 2017
test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted was flaky under load because there is no guarantee that a timer will fire within a given period of time. It had an exit handler that checked that the process was finishing in less than twice as much as a timer was set for. Under load, the timer could take over 200ms to fire even if it was set for 100ms, so this was causing the test to be flaky on CI from time to time. However, that timing check is unnecessary to identify the regression that the test was written for. When run with a version of Node.js that does not contain the fix that accompanied the test in its initial commit, an assertion indicating that there were still timers in the active timer list fired. So, this commit removes the exit handler timing check and relies on the existing robust active timers list length check. This allows us to move the test back to parallel because it does not seem to fail under load anymore. The test was refactored slightly, removing duplicated code to a function, using `assert.strictEqual()` instead of `assert.equal()`, changing a 10ms timer to 1ms, and improving the messages provided by assertions. Fixes: #8459 PR-URL: #10362 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2017
test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted was flaky under load because there is no guarantee that a timer will fire within a given period of time. It had an exit handler that checked that the process was finishing in less than twice as much as a timer was set for. Under load, the timer could take over 200ms to fire even if it was set for 100ms, so this was causing the test to be flaky on CI from time to time. However, that timing check is unnecessary to identify the regression that the test was written for. When run with a version of Node.js that does not contain the fix that accompanied the test in its initial commit, an assertion indicating that there were still timers in the active timer list fired. So, this commit removes the exit handler timing check and relies on the existing robust active timers list length check. This allows us to move the test back to parallel because it does not seem to fail under load anymore. The test was refactored slightly, removing duplicated code to a function, using `assert.strictEqual()` instead of `assert.equal()`, changing a 10ms timer to 1ms, and improving the messages provided by assertions. Fixes: #8459 PR-URL: #10362 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2017
test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted was flaky under load because there is no guarantee that a timer will fire within a given period of time. It had an exit handler that checked that the process was finishing in less than twice as much as a timer was set for. Under load, the timer could take over 200ms to fire even if it was set for 100ms, so this was causing the test to be flaky on CI from time to time. However, that timing check is unnecessary to identify the regression that the test was written for. When run with a version of Node.js that does not contain the fix that accompanied the test in its initial commit, an assertion indicating that there were still timers in the active timer list fired. So, this commit removes the exit handler timing check and relies on the existing robust active timers list length check. This allows us to move the test back to parallel because it does not seem to fail under load anymore. The test was refactored slightly, removing duplicated code to a function, using `assert.strictEqual()` instead of `assert.equal()`, changing a 10ms timer to 1ms, and improving the messages provided by assertions. Fixes: #8459 PR-URL: #10362 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2017
test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted was flaky under load because there is no guarantee that a timer will fire within a given period of time. It had an exit handler that checked that the process was finishing in less than twice as much as a timer was set for. Under load, the timer could take over 200ms to fire even if it was set for 100ms, so this was causing the test to be flaky on CI from time to time. However, that timing check is unnecessary to identify the regression that the test was written for. When run with a version of Node.js that does not contain the fix that accompanied the test in its initial commit, an assertion indicating that there were still timers in the active timer list fired. So, this commit removes the exit handler timing check and relies on the existing robust active timers list length check. This allows us to move the test back to parallel because it does not seem to fail under load anymore. The test was refactored slightly, removing duplicated code to a function, using `assert.strictEqual()` instead of `assert.equal()`, changing a 10ms timer to 1ms, and improving the messages provided by assertions. Fixes: #8459 PR-URL: #10362 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test timers
Description of change
test-timers-same-timeout-wrong-list-deleted was flaky under load because
there is no guarantee that a timer will fire within a given period of
time. It had an exit handler that checked that the process was finishing
in less than twice as much as a timer was set for. Under load, the
timer could take over 200ms to fire even if it was set for 100ms, so
this was causing the test to be flaky on CI from time to time.
However, that timing check is unnecessary to identify the regression
that the test was written for. When run with a version of Node.js that
does not contain the fix that accompanied the test in its initial
commit, an assertion indicating that there were still timers in the
active timer list fired. So, this commit removes the exit handler timing
check and relies on the existing robust active timers list length check.
This allows us to move the test back to parallel because it does not
seem to fail under load anymore.
The test was refactored slightly, removing duplicated code to a
function, using
assert.strictEqual()instead ofassert.equal(),changing a 10ms timer to 1ms, and improving the messages provided by
assertions.