Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort #10413

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2016
Merged

crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort #10413

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 29, 2016

Conversation

sam-github
Copy link
Contributor

Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: #9409 (comment)

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

src,crypto,tls

Description of change

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Dec 22, 2016
@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor Author

/to @bnoordhuis

@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor Author

ci: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5536/

@mscdex mscdex added the crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem. label Dec 22, 2016
@sam-github
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
d9ac34c 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: nodejs#9409 (comment)

PR-URL: nodejs#10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@sam-github sam-github force-pushed the use-check-ne-not-abort branch from 80a1a18 to d9ac34c Compare December 29, 2016 21:40
@sam-github sam-github merged commit d9ac34c into nodejs:master Dec 29, 2016
@sam-github sam-github deleted the use-check-ne-not-abort branch December 29, 2016 21:41
@evanlucas evanlucas mentioned this pull request Jan 3, 2017
Merged
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2017
@sam-github @evanlucas
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
20fe858 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: #9409 (comment)

PR-URL: #10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
evanlucas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2017
@sam-github @evanlucas
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
80e798e 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: #9409 (comment)

PR-URL: #10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@sam-github should this be backported?

@sam-github sam-github mentioned this pull request Jan 23, 2017
Closed
@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor Author

sam-github commented Jan 23, 2017 •
edited
Loading

backported in #10969

sam-github added a commit to sam-github/node that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2017
@sam-github
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
f923028 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: nodejs#9409 (comment)

PR-URL: nodejs#10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2017
@sam-github @MylesBorins
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
bba3dcf 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: #9409 (comment)

PR-URL: #10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2017
@sam-github @MylesBorins
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
6fa3c73 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: #9409 (comment)

PR-URL: #10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2017
@sam-github @MylesBorins
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
76bc92d 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: #9409 (comment)

PR-URL: #10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2017
@sam-github @MylesBorins
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
1f44922 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: #9409 (comment)

PR-URL: #10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2017
Merged
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2017
@sam-github @MylesBorins
crypto: use CHECK_NE instead of ABORT or abort
b48f6ff 
Use of abort() was added in 34febfb, and changed to ABORT()
in 21826ef, but conditional+ABORT() is better expressesed
using a CHECK_xxx() macro.

See: #9409 (comment)

PR-URL: #10413
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Mar 9, 2017
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@gibfahn gibfahn gibfahn approved these changes

@cjihrig cjihrig cjihrig approved these changes

@addaleax addaleax addaleax approved these changes

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis bnoordhuis approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. crypto Issues and PRs related to the crypto subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
9 participants
@sam-github @MylesBorins @bnoordhuis @jasnell @addaleax @cjihrig @gibfahn @mscdex @nodejs-github-bot