-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: cover thrown errors from exec() kill #11038
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
// Flags: --expose_internals | ||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
const cp = require('child_process'); | ||
const internalCp = require('internal/child_process'); | ||
|
||
if (process.argv[2] === 'child') { | ||
// Keep the process alive and printing to stdout. | ||
setInterval(() => { console.log('foo'); }, 1); | ||
} else { | ||
// Monkey patch ChildProcess#kill() to kill the process and then throw. | ||
const kill = internalCp.ChildProcess.prototype.kill; | ||
|
||
internalCp.ChildProcess.prototype.kill = function() { | ||
kill.apply(this, arguments); | ||
throw new Error('mock error'); | ||
}; | ||
|
||
const cmd = `${process.execPath} ${__filename} child`; | ||
const options = { maxBuffer: 0 }; | ||
const child = cp.exec(cmd, options, common.mustCall((err, stdout, stderr) => { | ||
// Verify that if ChildProcess#kill() throws, the error is reported. | ||
assert(/^Error: mock error$/.test(err)); | ||
assert.strictEqual(stdout, ''); | ||
assert.strictEqual(stderr, ''); | ||
assert.strictEqual(child.killed, true); | ||
})); | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if it throws because the child exited, wouldn't that be success?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure that I understand the question. Do you mean if Node decides to kill the child process, but in the interim it exits on its own? If
exithandler()
runs (via theclose
handler for example), then the error won't be reported because it contains a check to make sure it doesn't run twice.FWIW, this is the code path being tested.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
node could decided to kill the child, but between when it decided and the child is killed, the child can exit. It would be possible to special case
node/lib/child_process.js
Line 265 in 3268863
ESRCH
, and not call exit handler in that case, because it just means that node has not yet epolled the exit status, but it will in the next tick or so. But the event ordering of the timeout vs the process exit is indeterminate by nature, so its no big deal.