Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: cover thrown errors from exec() kill #11038

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
29 changes: 29 additions & 0 deletions test/parallel/test-child-process-exec-kill-throws.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
'use strict';
// Flags: --expose_internals
const common = require('../common');
const assert = require('assert');
const cp = require('child_process');
const internalCp = require('internal/child_process');

if (process.argv[2] === 'child') {
// Keep the process alive and printing to stdout.
setInterval(() => { console.log('foo'); }, 1);
} else {
// Monkey patch ChildProcess#kill() to kill the process and then throw.
const kill = internalCp.ChildProcess.prototype.kill;

internalCp.ChildProcess.prototype.kill = function() {
kill.apply(this, arguments);
throw new Error('mock error');
};

const cmd = `${process.execPath} ${__filename} child`;
const options = { maxBuffer: 0 };
const child = cp.exec(cmd, options, common.mustCall((err, stdout, stderr) => {
// Verify that if ChildProcess#kill() throws, the error is reported.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what if it throws because the child exited, wouldn't that be success?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure that I understand the question. Do you mean if Node decides to kill the child process, but in the interim it exits on its own? If exithandler() runs (via the close handler for example), then the error won't be reported because it contains a check to make sure it doesn't run twice.

FWIW, this is the code path being tested.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

node could decided to kill the child, but between when it decided and the child is killed, the child can exit. It would be possible to special case

ex = e;
for ESRCH, and not call exit handler in that case, because it just means that node has not yet epolled the exit status, but it will in the next tick or so. But the event ordering of the timeout vs the process exit is indeterminate by nature, so its no big deal.

assert(/^Error: mock error$/.test(err));
assert.strictEqual(stdout, '');
assert.strictEqual(stderr, '');
assert.strictEqual(child.killed, true);
}));
}