Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

v6.x Backport - test, eslintrc: s/assert.equal/assert.strictEqual/ #11795

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

v6.x Backport - test, eslintrc: s/assert.equal/assert.strictEqual/ #11795

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

gibfahn
Copy link
Member

@gibfahn gibfahn commented Mar 11, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Backport of #10698

Currently includes #11775, as otherwise there'd be way too many conflicts. You want the last two commits. Rebased as #11775 landed, can now be landed as is.

If you want to see the manual changes (most worth reviewing) see the unsquashed branch, especially the last commit.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

test

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added assert Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem. v6.x labels Mar 11, 2017
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member Author

gibfahn commented Mar 11, 2017 •
edited
Loading

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/8379/

EDIT: CI is green

Trott
Trott approved these changes Mar 17, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rubber stamp LGTM

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 22, 2017

needs to be rebased on the updated v6.x-staging branch

@gibfahn
Copy link
Member Author

gibfahn commented Mar 22, 2017 •
edited
Loading

needs to be rebased on the updated v6.x-staging branch

Done

Note that the "you only need the last two commits because the first two are from #11775" still applies.

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@gibfahn this needs a rebase, and likely will have some conflicts do to var -> let PR that landed

@gibfahn
test: s/assert.equal/assert.strictEqual/
bf1b90c 
Use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal in tests, manually
convert types where necessary.
@gibfahn
assert, tools: enforce strict (not)equal in eslint
55b528e 
Extend no-restricted-properties to catch use of assert.equal() and
assert.notEqual() and require assert.strictEqual() or
assert.notStrictEqual() instead.

Also update the eslint-ignore in lib/assert.js to avoid
assert.equal/notEqual linter errors in their definitions.
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member Author

gibfahn commented Apr 14, 2017

Rebased, I originally cherry-picked these commits on top of the var->let PR, so no conflicts to resolve 🍀 .

MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2017
@gibfahn @MylesBorins
test: s/assert.equal/assert.strictEqual/
a654502 
Use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal in tests, manually
convert types where necessary.

Backport-PR-URL: #11795
PR-URL: #10698
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2017
@gibfahn @MylesBorins
assert, tools: enforce strict (not)equal in eslint
acd9bc3 
Extend no-restricted-properties to catch use of assert.equal() and
assert.notEqual() and require assert.strictEqual() or
assert.notStrictEqual() instead.

Also update the eslint-ignore in lib/assert.js to avoid
assert.equal/notEqual linter errors in their definitions.

Backport-PR-URL: #11795
PR-URL: #10698
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
@gibfahn
Copy link
Member Author

gibfahn commented Apr 15, 2017

@MylesBorins I think you landed this in a654502 and acd9bc3 , so I'll close. Let me know if that's wrong!

@gibfahn gibfahn closed this Apr 15, 2017
@gibfahn gibfahn deleted the assert-strict-v6.x branch April 15, 2017 07:37
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2017
@gibfahn @MylesBorins
test: s/assert.equal/assert.strictEqual/
6f85c81 
Use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal in tests, manually
convert types where necessary.

Backport-PR-URL: #11795
PR-URL: #10698
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2017
@gibfahn @MylesBorins
assert, tools: enforce strict (not)equal in eslint
12c0ce7 
Extend no-restricted-properties to catch use of assert.equal() and
assert.notEqual() and require assert.strictEqual() or
assert.notStrictEqual() instead.

Also update the eslint-ignore in lib/assert.js to avoid
assert.equal/notEqual linter errors in their definitions.

Backport-PR-URL: #11795
PR-URL: #10698
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
andrew749 pushed a commit to michielbaird/node that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2017
@gibfahn @andrew749
test: s/assert.equal/assert.strictEqual/
3c6dbbb 
Use assert.strictEqual instead of assert.equal in tests, manually
convert types where necessary.

Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#11795
PR-URL: nodejs/node#10698
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
andrew749 pushed a commit to michielbaird/node that referenced this pull request Jul 19, 2017
@gibfahn @andrew749
assert, tools: enforce strict (not)equal in eslint
88a4ebc 
Extend no-restricted-properties to catch use of assert.equal() and
assert.notEqual() and require assert.strictEqual() or
assert.notStrictEqual() instead.

Also update the eslint-ignore in lib/assert.js to avoid
assert.equal/notEqual linter errors in their definitions.

Backport-PR-URL: nodejs/node#11795
PR-URL: nodejs/node#10698
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Teddy Katz <teddy.katz@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Trott Trott Trott approved these changes

Assignees

@jasnell jasnell

@MylesBorins MylesBorins

Labels
assert Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@gibfahn @jasnell @MylesBorins @Trott @nodejs-github-bot