-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
readline: rename deDupeHistory
option
#11950
readline: rename deDupeHistory
option
#11950
Conversation
Renames `options.deDupeHistory` → `options.removeHistoryDuplicates` for `readline.createInterface(options)`. The option name `removeHistoryDuplicates` is preferable to the semantically identical name `deDupeHistory` because "dedupe" (short for "deduplication") is obscure and neologistic while `removeHistoryDuplicates` is clear, though verbose. Updates tests and documentation for this option accordingly. Refs: #2982
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks.
https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/6951/ - previous run had infrastructural issues. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, although I think I like dedupeHistory
more. If I'm alone in that, this is fine :].
Thanks for the PR!
Renames `options.deDupeHistory` → `options.removeHistoryDuplicates` for `readline.createInterface(options)`. The option name `removeHistoryDuplicates` is preferable to the semantically identical name `deDupeHistory` because "dedupe" (short for "deduplication") is obscure and neologistic while `removeHistoryDuplicates` is clear, though verbose. Updates tests and documentation for this option accordingly. PR-URL: #11950 Ref: #2982 Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Landed in c8eec76 |
Renames `options.deDupeHistory` → `options.removeHistoryDuplicates` for `readline.createInterface(options)`. The option name `removeHistoryDuplicates` is preferable to the semantically identical name `deDupeHistory` because "dedupe" (short for "deduplication") is obscure and neologistic while `removeHistoryDuplicates` is clear, though verbose. Updates tests and documentation for this option accordingly. PR-URL: #11950 Ref: #2982 Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
should we change this in LTS? I erring towards no |
@MylesBorins This should be back-ported along with #2982 (if that one is back-ported, of course.) |
Renames `options.deDupeHistory` → `options.removeHistoryDuplicates` for `readline.createInterface(options)`. The option name `removeHistoryDuplicates` is preferable to the semantically identical name `deDupeHistory` because "dedupe" (short for "deduplication") is obscure and neologistic while `removeHistoryDuplicates` is clear, though verbose. Updates tests and documentation for this option accordingly. PR-URL: #11950 Ref: #2982 Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Renames `options.deDupeHistory` → `options.removeHistoryDuplicates` for `readline.createInterface(options)`. The option name `removeHistoryDuplicates` is preferable to the semantically identical name `deDupeHistory` because "dedupe" (short for "deduplication") is obscure and neologistic while `removeHistoryDuplicates` is clear, though verbose. Updates tests and documentation for this option accordingly. PR-URL: #11950 Ref: #2982 Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Renames `options.deDupeHistory` → `options.removeHistoryDuplicates` for `readline.createInterface(options)`. The option name `removeHistoryDuplicates` is preferable to the semantically identical name `deDupeHistory` because "dedupe" (short for "deduplication") is obscure and neologistic while `removeHistoryDuplicates` is clear, though verbose. Updates tests and documentation for this option accordingly. PR-URL: nodejs/node#11950 Ref: nodejs/node#2982 Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Evan Lucas <evanlucas@me.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Renames
options.deDupeHistory
→options.removeHistoryDuplicates
forreadline.createInterface(options)
.The option name
removeHistoryDuplicates
is preferable to the semantically identical namedeDupeHistory
because "dedupe" (short for "deduplication") is obscure and neologistic whileremoveHistoryDuplicates
is clear, though verbose. See this comment for more.Updates tests and documentation for this option accordingly.
Refs: #2982
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
readline