-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[async_wrap] call destroy hooks on uv_timer_t #13369
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
// Test that async ids that are added to the destroy queue while running a | ||
// `destroy` callback are handled correctly. | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
|
||
const initCalls = new Set(); | ||
let destroyResCallCount = 0; | ||
let res2; | ||
|
||
async_hooks.createHook({ | ||
init: common.mustCallAtLeast((id, provider, triggerId) => { | ||
if (provider === 'foobar') | ||
initCalls.add(id); | ||
}, 2), | ||
destroy: common.mustCallAtLeast((id) => { | ||
if (!initCalls.has(id)) return; | ||
|
||
switch (destroyResCallCount++) { | ||
case 0: | ||
// Trigger the second `destroy` call. | ||
res2.emitDestroy(); | ||
break; | ||
case 2: | ||
assert.fail('More than 2 destroy() invocations'); | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
}, 2) | ||
}).enable(); | ||
|
||
const res1 = new async_hooks.AsyncResource('foobar'); | ||
res2 = new async_hooks.AsyncResource('foobar'); | ||
res1.emitDestroy(); | ||
|
||
process.on('exit', () => assert.strictEqual(destroyResCallCount, 2)); |
27 changes: 27 additions & 0 deletions
27
test/parallel/test-async-hooks-top-level-clearimmediate.js
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
// Regression test for https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/13262 | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const assert = require('assert'); | ||
const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
|
||
let seenId, seenResource; | ||
|
||
async_hooks.createHook({ | ||
init: common.mustCall((id, provider, triggerId, resource) => { | ||
seenId = id; | ||
seenResource = resource; | ||
assert.strictEqual(provider, 'Immediate'); | ||
assert.strictEqual(triggerId, 1); | ||
}), | ||
before: common.mustNotCall(), | ||
after: common.mustNotCall(), | ||
destroy: common.mustCall((id) => { | ||
assert.strictEqual(seenId, id); | ||
}) | ||
}).enable(); | ||
|
||
const immediate = setImmediate(common.mustNotCall()); | ||
assert.strictEqual(immediate, seenResource); | ||
clearImmediate(immediate); |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
will this not call the
destroy
hook synchronously ifemitDestroy
was called from within thedestroy
hook? We don't want that becausedestroy
hooks should never be called synchronously.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AndreasMadsen It would act like a
nextTick()
. The current execution scope would complete before the destroy hook was called.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that came to me a few hours after I wrote that. Thanks!