-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
async_hooks: simplify fatalError #14051
async_hooks: simplify fatalError #14051
Conversation
Implement fatalError like ClearFatalExceptionHandlers.
Let's see how platform specific that |
Looks like the |
@@ -60,19 +60,11 @@ async_wrap.setupHooks({ init, | |||
destroy: emitDestroyN }); | |||
|
|||
// Used to fatally abort the process if a callback throws. | |||
function fatalError(e) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is everyone trying to kill this 😨
I like it as a way to bail from a callback or a Promise.catch
Ref: #13839 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just because it is useful for Promise.catch
doesn't mean that is useful here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Probably. I'll copy it to test/common/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Letting an error bubble with try {} finally {}
have always been the standard way of handling throws.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Except what async_hooks is doing isn't standard. This is a guard to prevent an abort from C++ if it detects stack corruption that can likely result from the user try catching/Promise wrapping the call, and to get useful core dumps. It also doesn't follow how this is handled in C++ (https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/v8.1.3/src/env-inl.h#L144-L160). I'm a big -1 on this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By "exporting FatalException
" do you mean expose it to JS?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If anything I'd like to export the code in Environment::AsyncHooks::pop_ids()
and use that as the uniform way to exit the process.
EDIT: Except it should show a JS stack instead of a C++ stack.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
By "exporting
FatalException
" do you mean expose it to JS?
Yes. At the very least I would like a unified way of making a fatal exception. Currently, there are a couple of different implementations floating around in nodecore. It makes things like --abort-on-uncaught-exception
difficult to test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At the very least I would like a unified way of making a fatal exception.
Sounds good to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So area this is currently a WIP?
I have reduced the const assert = require('assert');
const { spawnSync } = require('child_process');
const child = spawnSync(process.execPath, [
'--abort-on-uncaught-exception', '-e', 'throw new Error();'
]);
assert.strictEqual(child.signal, 'SIGABRT');
assert.strictEqual(child.code, null); |
Blocked by #14060 |
} | ||
for (var i = 0; i < active_hooks_array.length; i++) { | ||
if (typeof active_hooks_array[i][before_symbol] === 'function') { | ||
active_hooks_array[i][before_symbol](asyncId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Allowing an exception to bubble then be handled by a Promise or similar means that it's possible that not all hook callbacks execute, but users that have those unexecuted callbacks won't know that it hasn't been called. Consider the following:
const map = new Map();
createHook({
before(id) { map.set(id, /* some object */) },
after(id) { map.delete(id) },
}).enable();
You've just introduced a vector for a memory leak.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW If you're touching this you could use for...of
(supposed to be tiny bit faster on TF&I)
Ref: #13419 (comment)
if (async_hook_fields[kAfter] > 0) | ||
emitAfterN(asyncId); | ||
if (async_hook_fields[kAfter] > 0) { | ||
// Remove prepear for a fatal exception in case an error occurred |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/prepear/prepare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AndreasMadsen is the comment a TODO? Otherwise I'm not sure I understand what It means.
} | ||
|
||
pushAsyncIds(asyncId, triggerAsyncId); | ||
|
||
if (async_hook_fields[kBefore] === 0) | ||
return; | ||
emitBeforeN(asyncId); | ||
|
||
// Remove prepear for a fatal exception in case an error occurred |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
s/prepear/prepare
if (async_hook_fields[kAfter] > 0) | ||
emitAfterN(asyncId); | ||
if (async_hook_fields[kAfter] > 0) { | ||
// Remove prepear for a fatal exception in case an error occurred |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AndreasMadsen is the comment a TODO? Otherwise I'm not sure I understand what It means.
} | ||
for (var i = 0; i < active_hooks_array.length; i++) { | ||
if (typeof active_hooks_array[i][before_symbol] === 'function') { | ||
active_hooks_array[i][before_symbol](asyncId); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
BTW If you're touching this you could use for...of
(supposed to be tiny bit faster on TF&I)
Ref: #13419 (comment)
init(asyncId, type, triggerAsyncId, resource); | ||
didThrow = false; | ||
} finally { | ||
if (didThrow) clearFatalExceptionHandlers(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure it's correct to move this line from the N
variant to the S
variant?
@trevnorris just for explicitness what's the meaning of the |
Clearly, there is a lot of confusion so I will just close this PR. |
Yup, that's it. Thanks for the PR to make it more explicit. |
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
async_hooks
Simplify
fatalError
by implementing it likeClearFatalExceptionHandlers
.On my Mac I now get a
SIGILL
instead ofSIGABRT
. Very odd./cc @nodejs/async_hooks