-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
async_hooks: fix nested hooks mutation #14143
Closed
AndreasMadsen
wants to merge
7
commits into
nodejs:master
from
AndreasMadsen:async-hooks-fix-nested-mutation
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a4cca58
async_hooks: move restoreTmpHooks call to init
BridgeAR 19890ce
fixup: use fs instead of crypto
BridgeAR 3e5d7ba
async_hooks: fix nested hooks mutation
AndreasMadsen 65d4760
[squash] lint
AndreasMadsen d04802b
[squash] don't use crypto
AndreasMadsen 0b80a31
[squash] use finally block
AndreasMadsen cbd1f78
[squash] update comment
AndreasMadsen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
const fs = require('fs'); | ||
|
||
let nestedCall = false; | ||
|
||
async_hooks.createHook({ | ||
init: common.mustCall(function(id, type) { | ||
nestedHook.disable(); | ||
if (!nestedCall) { | ||
nestedCall = true; | ||
fs.access(__filename, common.mustCall()); | ||
} | ||
}, 2) | ||
}).enable(); | ||
|
||
const nestedHook = async_hooks.createHook({ | ||
init: common.mustCall(2) | ||
}).enable(); | ||
|
||
fs.access(__filename, common.mustCall()); |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
const fs = require('fs'); | ||
|
||
const nestedHook = async_hooks.createHook({ | ||
init: common.mustNotCall() | ||
}); | ||
let nestedCall = false; | ||
|
||
async_hooks.createHook({ | ||
init: common.mustCall(function(id, type) { | ||
nestedHook.enable(); | ||
if (!nestedCall) { | ||
nestedCall = true; | ||
fs.access(__filename, common.mustCall()); | ||
} | ||
}, 2) | ||
}).enable(); | ||
|
||
fs.access(__filename, common.mustCall()); |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | ||
'use strict'; | ||
|
||
const common = require('../common'); | ||
const async_hooks = require('async_hooks'); | ||
const fs = require('fs'); | ||
|
||
const nestedHook = async_hooks.createHook({ | ||
init: common.mustCall() | ||
}); | ||
|
||
async_hooks.createHook({ | ||
init: common.mustCall((id, type) => { | ||
nestedHook.enable(); | ||
}, 2) | ||
}).enable(); | ||
|
||
fs.access(__filename, common.mustCall(() => { | ||
fs.access(__filename, common.mustCall()); | ||
})); |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm worried that doing reference counting is too fragile.
Why not replace the
for
either with a.forEach
for with afor (const hook of Array.from(active_hooks_array))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you be more explicit?
edit: Just to avoid confusion, this is not a reference counting it is a depth counting.
.forEach
is not resistant to mutation.prints
1 2
.Array copy is too slow. When
async_hooks
is enabled this is the hottest code path we have.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ack. I was sure
.forEach
iterated over a fixed array (it just ignores newly added elements)