Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add a test description for test/parallel/test-cluster-fork-env.js #16833

Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions test/parallel/test-cluster-fork-env.js
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,10 +56,12 @@ if (cluster.isWorker) {
});

process.once('exit', function() {
assert.ok(checks.using, 'The worker did not receive the correct env.');
assert.ok(checks.using, 'The worker did not receive the correct env.' +
`${checks.using}`);
assert.ok(
checks.overwrite,
'The custom environment did not overwrite the existing environment.');
'The custom environment did not overwrite the existing environment.' +
`${checks.overwrite}`);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems we are lacking spaces here and using unnecessary concatenation and redundant templates. What if we use something like this?

    assert.ok(
      checks.using,
      `The worker did not receive the correct env. ${checks.using}`);
    assert.ok(
      checks.overwrite,
      `The custom environment did not overwrite the existing environment. ${
        checks.overwrite}`);

});

}