-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Combined TSC. #1710
Combined TSC. #1710
Conversation
mikeal
commented
May 15, 2015
- Adding node.js contributors to TSC.
- Removing @isaacs from the TSC (he told us yesterday he was resigning because he's too buys CEOing)
- Adding a section strictly for voting TSC members.
* **James M Snell** ([jasnell](https://github.com/jasnell)) <jasnell@gmail.com> (TSC) | ||
* **Julien Gilli** ([misterdjules](https://github.com/misterdjules)) <jgilli@nodejs.org> (TSC) | ||
* **Michael Dawson** ([mhdawson](https://github.com/mhdawson)) <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com> (TSC) | ||
* **Steven R Loomis** ([srl295](https://github.com/srl295)) <srloomis@us.ibm.com> (TSC) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
afaik Steven said he didn't need to be here since that would put IBM over the limit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
my count was off, even without @isaacs we've got 13 people which puts 3 from IBM below the 1/4 limit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Missing some @
in the nick links.
SGTM, it's a little out of practice to have someone else do it, but maybe we can get sign-off from everyone involved? (Or at least isaac, since he's leaving.) |
@Fishrock123 good point, let's make sure that we get a +1 from @isaacs✓ @srl295✓ @orangemocha✓ @jasnell✓ @misterdjules✓ @cjihrig✓ and @mhdawson |
+1 |
+1 |
+1
|
Hrm - +1 ish, but thought I should be under Collaborators instead of TSC to keep the counts right- right? |
Ah, yes. Good point. Will three members from IBM put us over the limit? If
|
This comment is on an outdated diff: #1710 (comment) @mikeal said:
|
Oh! Well excellent news then!
|
@mikeal +1! |
@mikeal could you please put orangemocha@nodejs.org as my email address? Otherwise LGTM. Thanks! |
+1, lgtm. Should we also list my release GPG key, since it was used for a lot of old releases? |
@isaacs @Fishrock123 we need to make a separation between "authorized for release of this project" vs "keys for previous releases" I think, and if we're doing that then we should pull in keys for @misterdjules and @tjfontaine as well. However, note that this discussion is on the io.js repo where it's only @Fishrock123, @chrisdickinson and myself that have made releases so perhaps this is not the place to list them all? |
Yeah, let's defer it for the converged repo. |
@mhdawson could you please sign off on this? :D |
(I'll merge it without his later today if he doesn't..) |
Replaced by #2085 |
These members were collaborators on the old joyent/node repo prior to convergence of the Node.js and io.js projects under the Node Foundation. This updates our list to represent that they are now also part of the TSC (Technical Steering Committee), which was previously known as the io.js TC. PR-URL: nodejs#2085 Reviewed-By: Mikeal Rogers <mikeal.rogers@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <rod@vagg.org> Membership changes also previously reviewed by many more TSC & former TC members in nodejs#1710