-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enhance crypto/sig.js coverage #17426
Closed
Closed
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
93bbd52
test: add test call crypt.Sign without new
Leko fddf884
test: add test call crypt.Verify without new
Leko e6a004e
test: add test padding is undefined
Leko dbfb965
test: add test saltLength is undefined
Leko 355029e
test: add missing semi coron
Leko dabbdf9
test: Fix typo sign -> verify
Leko 0b80e14
test: add expected behavior to assertion error message
Leko fc3ffc9
test: use + to break strings and fix indent
Leko 2d8ea1a
test: Use assert instead of assert.ok
Leko File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -15,6 +15,40 @@ const certPem = fixtures.readSync('test_cert.pem', 'ascii'); | |
const keyPem = fixtures.readSync('test_key.pem', 'ascii'); | ||
const modSize = 1024; | ||
|
||
{ | ||
const Sign = crypto.Sign; | ||
const instance = Sign('SHA256'); | ||
assert.ok(instance instanceof Sign, 'call sign constructor without new'); | ||
} | ||
|
||
{ | ||
const Verify = crypto.Verify; | ||
const instance = Verify('SHA256'); | ||
assert.ok(instance instanceof Verify, 'call verify constructor without new'); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Same as above. |
||
} | ||
|
||
common.expectsError( | ||
() => crypto.createVerify('SHA256').verify({ | ||
key: certPem, | ||
padding: undefined, | ||
}, ''), | ||
{ | ||
code: 'ERR_INVALID_OPT_VALUE', | ||
type: Error, | ||
message: 'The value "undefined" is invalid for option "padding"' | ||
}); | ||
|
||
common.expectsError( | ||
() => crypto.createVerify('SHA256').verify({ | ||
key: certPem, | ||
saltLength: undefined, | ||
}, ''), | ||
{ | ||
code: 'ERR_INVALID_OPT_VALUE', | ||
type: Error, | ||
message: 'The value "undefined" is invalid for option "saltLength"' | ||
}); | ||
|
||
// Test signing and verifying | ||
{ | ||
const s1 = crypto.createSign('SHA1') | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The message here seems to be more of a description of the test than communicate what was expected. Maybe something like "expected Sign to return a new instance when called without
new
keyword"?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for review.
I got it. I'll revise error message.