[v9.x] async_hooks: use typed array stack as fast path #18290
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Communicate the current async stack length through a
typed array field rather than a native binding method
- Add a new fixed-size `async_ids_fast_stack` typed array
that contains the async ID stack up to a fixed limit.
This increases performance noticeably, since most of the time
the async ID stack will not be more than a handful of
levels deep.
- Make the JS `pushAsyncIds()` and `popAsyncIds()` functions
do the same thing as the native ones if the fast path
is applicable.
Benchmarks:
$ ./node benchmark/compare.js --new ./node --old ./node-master --runs 10 --filter next-tick process | Rscript benchmark/compare.R
[00:03:25|% 100| 6/6 files | 20/20 runs | 1/1 configs]: Done
improvement confidence p.value
process/next-tick-breadth-args.js millions=4 19.72 % *** 3.013913e-06
process/next-tick-breadth.js millions=4 27.33 % *** 5.847983e-11
process/next-tick-depth-args.js millions=12 40.08 % *** 1.237127e-13
process/next-tick-depth.js millions=12 77.27 % *** 1.413290e-11
process/next-tick-exec-args.js millions=5 13.58 % *** 1.245180e-07
process/next-tick-exec.js millions=5 16.80 % *** 2.961386e-07
PR-URL: nodejs#17780
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
evanlucas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2018
- Communicate the current async stack length through a
typed array field rather than a native binding method
- Add a new fixed-size `async_ids_fast_stack` typed array
that contains the async ID stack up to a fixed limit.
This increases performance noticeably, since most of the time
the async ID stack will not be more than a handful of
levels deep.
- Make the JS `pushAsyncIds()` and `popAsyncIds()` functions
do the same thing as the native ones if the fast path
is applicable.
Benchmarks:
$ ./node benchmark/compare.js --new ./node --old ./node-master --runs 10 --filter next-tick process | Rscript benchmark/compare.R
[00:03:25|% 100| 6/6 files | 20/20 runs | 1/1 configs]: Done
improvement confidence p.value
process/next-tick-breadth-args.js millions=4 19.72 % *** 3.013913e-06
process/next-tick-breadth.js millions=4 27.33 % *** 5.847983e-11
process/next-tick-depth-args.js millions=12 40.08 % *** 1.237127e-13
process/next-tick-depth.js millions=12 77.27 % *** 1.413290e-11
process/next-tick-exec-args.js millions=5 13.58 % *** 1.245180e-07
process/next-tick-exec.js millions=5 16.80 % *** 2.961386e-07
Backport-PR-URL: #18290
PR-URL: #17780
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
Landed in dd56bd1. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport #17780 to v9.x
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/15582/
@evanlucas