-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stream: avoid pause with unpipe in buffered write #2325
Conversation
@mscdex This fixes the problem, thank you so much, would love to see this landed 💯 👍 I'm currently using this as a workaround. Is it stupid as fuck or should it work? function done (err) {
if (isDone) return
isDone = true
req.unpipe(busboy)
req.resume()
busboy.removeAllListeners()
/* Work around bug in Node.js
* https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/2323
*/
setImmediate(function () {
if (req._readableState.awaitDrain === 1) {
req._readableState.awaitDrain--
req.resume()
}
})
onFinished(req, function () { next(err) })
} I'm also having some trouble which forces me to add the Again, thank you for the quick help! |
/cc @nodejs/streams |
writer1.once('chunk-received', function() { | ||
reader.unpipe(writer1); | ||
reader.pipe(writer2); | ||
reader.push(new Buffer(560000)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what's the significants of this number, is it being used to bust the buffer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was copied from the test case in #2323. I think the point though is to fill up the internal buffer to cause the write()
to return false.
If someone could help me to find a workaround for earlier Node versions (preferably back to 0.10) that would be very much appreciated. I've tried here: expressjs/multer#205 |
37b7ff1
to
bcc79eb
Compare
Ok, updated PR according to suggestions. |
9b13ecb
to
b879ce0
Compare
updated to use CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit/799/ Does this look good to land now? |
There can be a comment which explains the importance of |
b879ce0
to
6176c8b
Compare
If a pipe is cleaned up (due to unpipe) during a write that returned false, the source stream can get stuck in a paused state. Fixes: nodejs#2323
6176c8b
to
91819e0
Compare
Landed in 6899094. |
If a pipe is cleaned up (due to unpipe) during a write that returned false, the source stream can get stuck in a paused state. Fixes: nodejs#2323 PR-URL: nodejs#2325 Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
Nice, thanks! |
Landed in v4.x in 7b9f78a |
Is this fixed in v4.2.0? |
@omrilitov It's included in v4.2.0. |
In 6899094 (nodejs#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: nodejs#5820
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
In 6899094 (#2325), the conditions for increasing `readableState.awaitDrain` when writing to a piping destination returns false were changed so that they could not actually be met, effectively leaving `readableState.awaitDrain` with a constant value of 0. This patch changes the conditions to testing whether the stream for which `.write()` returned false is still a piping destination, which was likely the intention of the original patch. Fixes: #5820 Fixes: #5257 PR-URL: #6023 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
If a pipe is cleaned up (due to unpipe) during a failed write(),
the source stream can get stuck in a paused state.
Fixes: #2323