Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: ensure error function call on inspector disabled #23586

Closed

Conversation

madeinjam
Copy link
Contributor

If the process.config.variables.v8_enable_inspector
is undefined or set to 0 and the sendInspectorCommand
function is called, it should call the error function
and should NOT call the callback function.

Test added to cover ./internal/util/inspector.js L4
https://coverage.nodejs.org/coverage-be346d9d32e0aacc/root/internal/util/inspector.js.html#L4

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows [commit guidelines]

We are migrating towards using internalBinding(\'options\').getOptions()
instead of process.binding(\'config\') to access the value of the
--experimental-vm-modules command line option.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Oct 12, 2018
@targos targos added the code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. label Oct 12, 2018
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great first contribution!

@addaleax addaleax added the inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol label Oct 12, 2018
@addaleax
Copy link
Member


inspector.sendInspectorCommand(
common.mustNotCall('Inspector callback should not be called'),
common.mustCall(restoreProcessVar, 1),
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, @madeinjam! Welcome and thanks for the pull request! I believe restoreProcessVar() can be removed from the file. The process exits, so there's no need to reset the value.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @Trott ! I made the change, thank you!

If the process.config.variables.v8_enable_inspector
is undefined or set to 0 and the sendInspectorCommand
function is called, it should call the error function
and should NOT call the callback function.
@madeinjam madeinjam force-pushed the feature/add-test-to-inspector branch from 3379a04 to 2431bca Compare October 13, 2018 17:51
Since the process exists after the test, there is no need to backup and
restore the process.config.variables.v8_enable_inspector variable.
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 13, 2018

@Trott Trott added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Oct 13, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 13, 2018

Collaborators, 👍 here to approve fast-tracking.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 13, 2018

Landed in 9d1c9d7

@Trott Trott closed this Oct 13, 2018
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 13, 2018

Thanks for the contribution! 🎉

(If you're interested in other possible contributions to Node.js but don't have a good idea of where to start looking, some ideas are posted at https://www.nodetodo.org/next-steps/.)

Trott pushed a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2018
We are migrating towards using internalBinding(\'options\').getOptions()
instead of process.binding(\'config\') to access the value of the
--experimental-vm-modules command line option.

PR-URL: nodejs#23586
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
We are migrating towards using internalBinding(\'options\').getOptions()
instead of process.binding(\'config\') to access the value of the
--experimental-vm-modules command line option.

PR-URL: #23586
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2018
We are migrating towards using internalBinding(\'options\').getOptions()
instead of process.binding(\'config\') to access the value of the
--experimental-vm-modules command line option.

PR-URL: #23586
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
We are migrating towards using internalBinding(\'options\').getOptions()
instead of process.binding(\'config\') to access the value of the
--experimental-vm-modules command line option.

PR-URL: #23586
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
We are migrating towards using internalBinding(\'options\').getOptions()
instead of process.binding(\'config\') to access the value of the
--experimental-vm-modules command line option.

PR-URL: #23586
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
We are migrating towards using internalBinding(\'options\').getOptions()
instead of process.binding(\'config\') to access the value of the
--experimental-vm-modules command line option.

PR-URL: #23586
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants