Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: fix assert.strictEqual() parameter order #23587

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

blakehall
Copy link
Contributor

@blakehall blakehall commented Oct 12, 2018

The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Oct 12, 2018
@targos targos added the code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. label Oct 12, 2018
@BridgeAR BridgeAR changed the title test: fix assert.strictEqual() parameter order in test-path-maklong.js test: fix assert.strictEqual() parameter order Oct 12, 2018
@addaleax addaleax added the path Issues and PRs related to the path subsystem. label Oct 12, 2018
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.

PR-URL: nodejs#23587
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2018
The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.

PR-URL: nodejs#23587
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Landed in c30658c 🎉

@blakehall congratulations on your commit to Node.js!

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Oct 15, 2018
jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2018
The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.

PR-URL: #23587
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2018
The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.

PR-URL: #23587
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2018
The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.

PR-URL: #23587
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 27, 2018
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2018
The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.

PR-URL: #23587
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2018
The argument order in the strictEqual check was in the wrong order.
The first argument is now the actual value and the second argument is
the expected value.

PR-URL: #23587
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com>
@codebytere codebytere mentioned this pull request Nov 29, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code-and-learn Issues related to the Code-and-Learn events and PRs submitted during the events. path Issues and PRs related to the path subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants