Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: show stdout and stderr in test-cli-syntax when it fails #24720

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

To help debugging the flake with the log from the CI.

Refs: #24403

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

To help debugging the flake with the log from the CI.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Nov 29, 2018
@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

There seems to be something off with another test case: err.code is not always set when the process fails, somehow we got a null instead of a number https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/2116/nodes=freebsd11-x64/testReport/junit/(root)/test121/parallel_test_cli_syntax/

@joyeecheung
Copy link
Member Author

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Nov 29, 2018

Resume Build won't rebase so you'll get a lot of that irksome known_issues/test-vm-timeout-escape-nexttick on Raspberry Pi. Here's a rebuild for Raspberry Pi only so that it rebases and gets the status file change marking that test as flaky: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-arm-fanned/4761/

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 1, 2018
Trott pushed a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2018
To help debugging the flake with the log from the CI.

PR-URL: nodejs#24720
Refs: nodejs#24403
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Dec 1, 2018

Landed in 3fb627b

@Trott Trott closed this Dec 1, 2018
BridgeAR pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2018
To help debugging the flake with the log from the CI.

PR-URL: #24720
Refs: #24403
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2018
4 tasks
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
To help debugging the flake with the log from the CI.

PR-URL: nodejs#24720
Refs: nodejs#24403
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2019
To help debugging the flake with the log from the CI.

PR-URL: #24720
Refs: #24403
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Feb 12, 2019
rvagg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2019
To help debugging the flake with the log from the CI.

PR-URL: #24720
Refs: #24403
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daniel Bevenius <daniel.bevenius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants