Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: remove flag for test-addon-uv-handle-leak #25327

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Jan 3, 2019

test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Jan 3, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Jan 3, 2019

@Trott Trott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Jan 3, 2019
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Jan 6, 2019

Landed in 7ed790e

@Trott Trott closed this Jan 6, 2019
Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2019
test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

PR-URL: nodejs#25327
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2019
test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

PR-URL: #25327
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
refack pushed a commit to refack/node that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2019
test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

PR-URL: nodejs#25327
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2019
BridgeAR pushed a commit to BridgeAR/node that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2019
test-addon-uv-handle-leak only requires worker_threads for the
subprocess which it explicitly calls with --experimental-worker. The
main test itself does not need it. Remove Flags: comment and move
loading of worker_threads into subprocess-only logic.

PR-URL: nodejs#25327
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Daijiro Wachi <daijiro.wachi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
@Trott Trott deleted the worker-child branch January 13, 2022 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants