Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: use fipsMode instead of common.hasFipsCrypto #25510

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Jan 15, 2019

Currently, test-cli-node-print-help uses common.hasFipsCrypto to
determine if the test should check for the existence of FIPS related
options (--enable-fips, and --force-fips). The FIPS options are
available when node has been compiled against an OpenSSL library with
FIPS support in which case the test would verify that these options
are available. But by using crypto.fips (which uses crypto.getFips())
this would only be checked when fips has been enabled, but these
options are available regardless if FIPS is enabled or disabled.

This commit updates the test to use fipsMode from config to determine
if the FIPS options existence should be checked.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@danbev sadly an error occured when I tried to trigger a build :(

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Jan 15, 2019
Copy link
Member

@bnoordhuis bnoordhuis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a suggestion. Commit log typo: s/availalbe/available/

test/parallel/test-cli-node-print-help.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Currently, test-cli-node-print-help uses common.hasFipsCrypto to
determine if the test should check for the existence of FIPS related
options (--enable-fips, and --force-fips). The FIPS options are
available when node has been compiled against an OpenSSL library with
FIPS support in which case the test would verify that these  options
are available. But by using crypto.fips (which uses crypto.getFips())
this would only be checked when fips has been enabled, but these
options are available regardless if FIPS is enabled or disabled.

This commit updates the test to use fipsMode from config to determine
if the FIPS options existence should be checked.
@danbev danbev force-pushed the fips-cli-print-test branch from d632986 to 2bed534 Compare January 15, 2019 07:11
@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Jan 16, 2019

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Jan 17, 2019

Re-run of failing node-test-commit-windows-fanned ✔️

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Jan 18, 2019

Landed in c0acece.

@danbev danbev closed this Jan 18, 2019
@danbev danbev deleted the fips-cli-print-test branch January 18, 2019 11:12
danbev added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2019
Currently, test-cli-node-print-help uses common.hasFipsCrypto to
determine if the test should check for the existence of FIPS related
options (--enable-fips, and --force-fips). The FIPS options are
available when node has been compiled against an OpenSSL library with
FIPS support in which case the test would verify that these  options
are available. But by using crypto.fips (which uses crypto.getFips())
this would only be checked when fips has been enabled, but these
options are available regardless if FIPS is enabled or disabled.

This commit updates the test to use fipsMode from config to determine
if the FIPS options existence should be checked.

PR-URL: #25510
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2019
Currently, test-cli-node-print-help uses common.hasFipsCrypto to
determine if the test should check for the existence of FIPS related
options (--enable-fips, and --force-fips). The FIPS options are
available when node has been compiled against an OpenSSL library with
FIPS support in which case the test would verify that these  options
are available. But by using crypto.fips (which uses crypto.getFips())
this would only be checked when fips has been enabled, but these
options are available regardless if FIPS is enabled or disabled.

This commit updates the test to use fipsMode from config to determine
if the FIPS options existence should be checked.

PR-URL: #25510
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Jan 24, 2019
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2019
Currently, test-cli-node-print-help uses common.hasFipsCrypto to
determine if the test should check for the existence of FIPS related
options (--enable-fips, and --force-fips). The FIPS options are
available when node has been compiled against an OpenSSL library with
FIPS support in which case the test would verify that these  options
are available. But by using crypto.fips (which uses crypto.getFips())
this would only be checked when fips has been enabled, but these
options are available regardless if FIPS is enabled or disabled.

This commit updates the test to use fipsMode from config to determine
if the FIPS options existence should be checked.

PR-URL: #25510
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request May 1, 2019
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 10, 2019
Currently, test-cli-node-print-help uses common.hasFipsCrypto to
determine if the test should check for the existence of FIPS related
options (--enable-fips, and --force-fips). The FIPS options are
available when node has been compiled against an OpenSSL library with
FIPS support in which case the test would verify that these  options
are available. But by using crypto.fips (which uses crypto.getFips())
this would only be checked when fips has been enabled, but these
options are available regardless if FIPS is enabled or disabled.

This commit updates the test to use fipsMode from config to determine
if the FIPS options existence should be checked.

PR-URL: #25510
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2019
Currently, test-cli-node-print-help uses common.hasFipsCrypto to
determine if the test should check for the existence of FIPS related
options (--enable-fips, and --force-fips). The FIPS options are
available when node has been compiled against an OpenSSL library with
FIPS support in which case the test would verify that these  options
are available. But by using crypto.fips (which uses crypto.getFips())
this would only be checked when fips has been enabled, but these
options are available regardless if FIPS is enabled or disabled.

This commit updates the test to use fipsMode from config to determine
if the FIPS options existence should be checked.

PR-URL: #25510
Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Sam Roberts <vieuxtech@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants