vm: do not overwrite error when creating context #26112
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
An empty `Local<>` already indicates that an exception is pending, so there is no need to throw an exception. In the case of Workers, this could override a `.terminate()` call.
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
cjihrig
approved these changes
Feb 14, 2019
| if (!process.env.HAS_STARTED_WORKER) { | ||
| process.env.HAS_STARTED_WORKER = 1; | ||
| const w = new Worker(__filename); | ||
| setTimeout(() => w.terminate(), 50); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is using the 'online' event here instead an option?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@cjihrig I’ve added that but kept the timeout, it still seems to make this fail more reliably locally (with the node master executable).
devsnek
approved these changes
Feb 15, 2019
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/20787/ (:white_check_mark:) |
addaleax
added
the
author ready
jasnell
approved these changes
Feb 15, 2019
|
Landed in 0896fbe |
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2019
An empty `Local<>` already indicates that an exception is pending, so there is no need to throw an exception. In the case of Workers, this could override a `.terminate()` call. PR-URL: #26112 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2019
An empty `Local<>` already indicates that an exception is pending, so there is no need to throw an exception. In the case of Workers, this could override a `.terminate()` call. PR-URL: #26112 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 28, 2019
An empty `Local<>` already indicates that an exception is pending, so there is no need to throw an exception. In the case of Workers, this could override a `.terminate()` call. PR-URL: #26112 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
An empty
Local<>already indicates that an exception is pending,so there is no need to throw an exception. In the case of Workers,
this could override a
.terminate()call.Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes