tsc: adjust TSC membership for IBM+StrongLoop #2858
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Following the IBM+StrongLoop announcement last week, we (@piscisaureus, @bnoordhuis, @srl295, @mhdawson, and myself) want to take a moment to reiterate our personal commitment to Node.js and the Foundation. Per the TSC rules, any one company is limited to no more than 1/4 of the voting seats on the TSC and after talking it over amongst ourselves, @srl295 and @mhdawson have elected to step back from the TSC for now. What I would propose is that they continue to participate in the weekly TSC meetings as observers; and that once the membership expands, they be considered once again for full TSC status. Both Steven and Michael will continue to be actively involved with Node.js. Both are active members of various Working Groups. (Michael chairs the Benchmarking workgroup and Steven chairs the Intl workgroup.) /cc @nodejs/tsc
jasnell
added
tsc-agenda
meta
|
LGTM, pending any required TSC discussion. |
|
LGTM |
2 similar comments
|
LGTM |
|
LGTM |
|
lgtm |
|
LGTM |
|
Seems like a pretty solid consensus ;-) Will land this momentarily |
jasnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2015
Following the IBM+StrongLoop announcement last week, we (@piscisaureus, @bnoordhuis, @srl295, @mhdawson, and myself) want to take a moment to reiterate our personal commitment to Node.js and the Foundation. Per the TSC rules, any one company is limited to no more than 1/4 of the voting seats on the TSC and after talking it over amongst ourselves, @srl295 and @mhdawson have elected to step back from the TSC for now. What I would propose is that they continue to participate in the weekly TSC meetings as observers; and that once the membership expands, they be considered once again for full TSC status. Both Steven and Michael will continue to be actively involved with Node.js. Both are active members of various Working Groups. (Michael chairs the Benchmarking workgroup and Steven chairs the Intl workgroup.) /cc @nodejs/tsc Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor@indutny.com> Reviewed-By: Alexis Campailla <orangemocha@nodejs.org> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <r@va.gg> Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trevnorris@nodejs.org> PR-URL: #2858
|
Landed in 7d927ab |
|
While this is closed and landed, I'm going to leave it on the tsc-agenda to make sure the change is at least mentioned on tomorrows TSC call. |
jasnell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2015
Following the IBM+StrongLoop announcement last week, we (@piscisaureus, @bnoordhuis, @srl295, @mhdawson, and myself) want to take a moment to reiterate our personal commitment to Node.js and the Foundation. Per the TSC rules, any one company is limited to no more than 1/4 of the voting seats on the TSC and after talking it over amongst ourselves, @srl295 and @mhdawson have elected to step back from the TSC for now. What I would propose is that they continue to participate in the weekly TSC meetings as observers; and that once the membership expands, they be considered once again for full TSC status. Both Steven and Michael will continue to be actively involved with Node.js. Both are active members of various Working Groups. (Michael chairs the Benchmarking workgroup and Steven chairs the Intl workgroup.) /cc @nodejs/tsc Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Fedor Indutny <fedor@indutny.com> Reviewed-By: Alexis Campailla <orangemocha@nodejs.org> Reviewed-By: Rod Vagg <r@va.gg> Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trevnorris@nodejs.org> PR-URL: #2858
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following the IBM+StrongLoop announcement last week, we
(@piscisaureus, @bnoordhuis, @srl295, @mhdawson, and myself)
want to take a moment to reiterate our personal commitment
to Node.js and the Foundation.
Per the TSC rules, any one company is limited to no more than
1/4 of the voting seats on the TSC and after talking it over
amongst ourselves, @srl295 and @mhdawson have elected to step
back from the TSC for now in order to keep IBM within the
established limit.
What I would propose is that they continue to participate in the
weekly TSC meetings as observers; and that once the membership
expands, they be considered once again for full TSC status.
Both Steven and Michael will continue to be actively involved
with Node.js. Both are active members of various Working Groups.
(Michael chairs the Benchmarking workgroup and Steven chairs the
Intl workgroup.)
/cc @nodejs/tsc