Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

V10.16.3 proposal #29148

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Aug 15, 2019
Merged

V10.16.3 proposal #29148

merged 19 commits into from
Aug 15, 2019

Conversation

BethGriggs
Copy link
Member

2019-08-15, Version 10.16.3 'Dubnium' (LTS), @BethGriggs

Notable changes

This is a security release.

Node.js, as well as many other implementations of HTTP/2, have been found
vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks.
See https://github.com/Netflix/security-bulletins/blob/master/advisories/third-party/2019-002.md
for more information.

Vulnerabilities fixed:

  • CVE-2019-9511 “Data Dribble”: The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
  • CVE-2019-9512 “Ping Flood”: The attacker sends continual pings to an HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
  • CVE-2019-9513 “Resource Loop”: The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU, potentially leading to a denial of service.
  • CVE-2019-9514 “Reset Flood”: The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
  • CVE-2019-9515 “Settings Flood”: The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
  • CVE-2019-9516 “0-Length Headers Leak”: The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory, potentially leading to a denial of service.
  • CVE-2019-9517 “Internal Data Buffering”: The attacker opens the HTTP/2 window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
  • CVE-2019-9518 “Empty Frames Flood”: The attacker sends a stream of frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU, potentially leading to a denial of service. (Discovered by Piotr Sikora of Google)

Commits

  • [74507fae34] - deps: update nghttp2 to 1.39.2 (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [a397c881ec] - deps: update nghttp2 to 1.39.1 (gengjiawen) #28448
  • [fedfa12a33] - deps: update nghttp2 to 1.38.0 (gengjiawen) #27295
  • [ab0f2ace36] - (SEMVER-MINOR) deps: update nghttp2 to 1.37.0 (gengjiawen) #26990
  • [0acbe05ee2] - http2: allow security revert for Ping/Settings Flood (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [c152449012] - http2: pause input processing if sending output (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [0ce699c7b1] - http2: stop reading from socket if writes are in progress (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [17357d37a9] - http2: consider 0-length non-end DATA frames an error (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [460f896c63] - http2: shrink default vector::reserve() allocations (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [f4242e24f9] - http2: handle 0-length headers better (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [477461a51f] - http2: limit number of invalid incoming frames (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [05dada46ee] - http2: limit number of rejected stream openings (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [7f11465572] - http2: do not create ArrayBuffers when no DATA received (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [2eb914ff5f] - http2: only call into JS when necessary for session events (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [76a7ada15d] - http2: improve JS-side debug logging (Anna Henningsen) #29122
  • [00f153da13] - http2: improve http2 code a bit (James M Snell) #23984
  • [a0a14c809f] - src: pass along errors from http2 object creation (Anna Henningsen) #25822
  • [d85e4006ab] - test: apply test-http2-max-session-memory-leak from v12.x (Anna Henningsen) #29122

jasnell and others added 18 commits August 15, 2019 15:14
Multiple general improvements to http2 internals for
readability and efficiency

[This backport applied to v10.x cleanly.]

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #23984
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ujjwal Sharma <usharma1998@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
[This backport applied to v10.x cleanly.]

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #25822
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #26990
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #27295
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Yongsheng Zhang <zyszys98@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Masashi Hirano <shisama07@gmail.com>
Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #28448
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
This includes mitigations for CVE-2019-9512/CVE-2019-9515.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
DRY up the `debug()` calls, and in particular, avoid building template
strings before we know whether we need to.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
For some JS events, it only makes sense to call into JS when there
are listeners for the event in question.

The overhead is noticeable if a lot of these events are emitted during
the lifetime of a session. To reduce this overhead, keep track of
whether any/how many JS listeners are present, and if there are none,
skip calls into JS altogether.

This is part of performance improvements to mitigate CVE-2019-9513.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Lazily allocate `ArrayBuffer`s for the contents of DATA frames.
Creating `ArrayBuffer`s is, sadly, not a cheap operation with V8.

This is part of performance improvements to mitigate CVE-2019-9513.

Together with the previous commit, these changes improve throughput
in the adversarial case by about 100 %, and there is little more
that we can do besides artificially limiting the rate of incoming
metadata frames (i.e. after this patch, CPU usage is virtually
exclusively in libnghttp2).

[This backport also applies changes from 83e1b97 and required
some manual work due to the lack of `AllocatedBuffer` on v10.x.]

Refs: #26201

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Limit the number of streams that are rejected upon creation. Since
each such rejection is associated with an `NGHTTP2_ENHANCE_YOUR_CALM`
error that should tell the peer to not open any more streams,
continuing to open streams should be read as a sign of a misbehaving
peer. The limit is currently set to 100 but could be changed or made
configurable.

This is intended to mitigate CVE-2019-9514.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Limit the number of invalid input frames, as they may be pointing towards a
misbehaving peer. The limit is currently set to 1000 but could be changed or
made configurable.

This is intended to mitigate CVE-2019-9514.

[This commit differs from the v12.x one due to the lack of
libuv/libuv@ee24ce900e5714c950b248da2b.
See the comment in the test for more details.]

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Ignore headers with 0-length names and track memory for headers
the way we track it for other HTTP/2 session memory too.

This is intended to mitigate CVE-2019-9516.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Allocating memory upfront comes with overhead, and in particular,
`std::vector` implementations do not necessarily return memory
to the system when one might expect that (e.g. after shrinking the
vector).

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This is intended to mitigate CVE-2019-9518.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
If a write to the underlying socket finishes asynchronously, that
means that we cannot write any more data at that point without waiting
for it to finish. If this happens, we should also not be producing any
more input.

This is part of mitigating CVE-2019-9511/CVE-2019-9517.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
If we are waiting for the ability to send more output, we should not
process more input. This commit a) makes us send output earlier,
during processing of input, if we accumulate a lot and b) allows
interrupting the call into nghttp2 that processes input data
and resuming it at a later time, if we do find ourselves in a position
where we are waiting to be able to send more output.

This is part of mitigating CVE-2019-9511/CVE-2019-9517.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
nghttp2 has updated its limit for outstanding Ping/Settings ACKs
to 1000. This commit allows reverting to the old default of 10000.

The associated CVEs are CVE-2019-9512/CVE-2019-9515.

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Refs: #27914

Backport-PR-URL: #29123
PR-URL: #29122
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. v10.x labels Aug 15, 2019
@BethGriggs
Copy link
Member Author

I noticed that the nghttp upgrade to 1.37.0 was marked Semver-Minor whereas the subsequent upgrades were not. Should this release be changed to be a minor (and the upcoming v8.x release)? //cc @nodejs/lts @addaleax

@BethGriggs
Copy link
Member Author

ping @nodejs/http2

@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor

If ng 1.37 #26990 was semver-minor, then yes, I guess this one should be, too. I can note that in the sec release notes (since I predicted the exact upcoming version numbers wrongly).

How does this interact with v8? That will be just another minor, right?

@sam-github
Copy link
Contributor

cf. #26990 (comment)

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

#26990 was erroneously labelled semver-minor, as we don’t expose nghttp2’s API. semver-patch is correct here.

@addaleax addaleax mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2019
This is a security release.

Notable changes:

Node.js, as well as many other implementations of HTTP/2, have been
found vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks.
See https://github.com/Netflix/security-bulletins/blob/master/advisories/third-party/2019-002.md
for more information.

Vulnerabilities fixed:

* CVE-2019-9511 “Data Dribble”: The attacker requests a large amount of
  data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate
  window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data
  in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued,
  this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both, potentially leading to a
  denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9512 “Ping Flood”: The attacker sends continual pings to an
  HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses.
  Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume
  excess CPU, memory, or both, potentially leading to a denial of
  service.
* CVE-2019-9513 “Resource Loop”: The attacker creates multiple request
  streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way
  that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume
  excess CPU, potentially leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9514 “Reset Flood”: The attacker opens a number of streams
  and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a
  stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer
  queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU,or
  both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9515 “Settings Flood”: The attacker sends a stream of
  SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer
  reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS
  frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how
  efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory,
  or both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9516 “0-Length Headers Leak”: The attacker sends a stream of
  headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value,
  optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some
  implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the
  allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess
  memory, potentially leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9517 “Internal Data Buffering”: The attacker opens the HTTP/2
  window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave
  the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the
  bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a
  large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the
  responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both, potentially
  leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9518 “Empty Frames Flood”: The attacker sends a stream of
  frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These
  frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The
  peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack
  bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU, potentially leading to a
  denial of service. (Discovered by Piotr Sikora of Google)

PR-URL: #29148
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@sam-github sam-github requested a review from addaleax August 15, 2019 18:43
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

nodejs-github-bot commented Aug 15, 2019

@BethGriggs
Copy link
Member Author

All release builds are complete, just waiting on Windows CI

@BethGriggs BethGriggs merged commit 75657ee into v10.x Aug 15, 2019
BethGriggs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2019
BethGriggs added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2019
This is a security release.

Notable changes:

Node.js, as well as many other implementations of HTTP/2, have been
found vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks.
See https://github.com/Netflix/security-bulletins/blob/master/advisories/third-party/2019-002.md
for more information.

Vulnerabilities fixed:

* CVE-2019-9511 “Data Dribble”: The attacker requests a large amount of
  data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate
  window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data
  in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued,
  this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both, potentially leading to a
  denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9512 “Ping Flood”: The attacker sends continual pings to an
  HTTP/2 peer, causing the peer to build an internal queue of responses.
  Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume
  excess CPU, memory, or both, potentially leading to a denial of
  service.
* CVE-2019-9513 “Resource Loop”: The attacker creates multiple request
  streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way
  that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume
  excess CPU, potentially leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9514 “Reset Flood”: The attacker opens a number of streams
  and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a
  stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer
  queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU,or
  both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9515 “Settings Flood”: The attacker sends a stream of
  SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer
  reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS
  frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how
  efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory,
  or both, potentially leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9516 “0-Length Headers Leak”: The attacker sends a stream of
  headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value,
  optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some
  implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the
  allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess
  memory, potentially leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9517 “Internal Data Buffering”: The attacker opens the HTTP/2
  window so the peer can send without constraint; however, they leave
  the TCP window closed so the peer cannot actually write (many of) the
  bytes on the wire. The attacker then sends a stream of requests for a
  large response object. Depending on how the servers queue the
  responses, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both, potentially
  leading to a denial of service.
* CVE-2019-9518 “Empty Frames Flood”: The attacker sends a stream of
  frames with an empty payload and without the end-of-stream flag. These
  frames can be DATA, HEADERS, CONTINUATION and/or PUSH_PROMISE. The
  peer spends time processing each frame disproportionate to attack
  bandwidth. This can consume excess CPU, potentially leading to a
  denial of service. (Discovered by Piotr Sikora of Google)

PR-URL: #29148
@BethGriggs BethGriggs deleted the v10.16.3-proposal branch August 16, 2019 10:23
@BethGriggs BethGriggs mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants