-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: fix unsafe writable stream code examples #29425
Closed
ckarande
wants to merge
2
commits into
nodejs:master
from
ckarande:stream-doc-updates-using-finished
Closed
doc: fix unsafe writable stream code examples #29425
ckarande
wants to merge
2
commits into
nodejs:master
from
ckarande:stream-doc-updates-using-finished
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Update writable stream code example using async iterator to use safer `finished()` method instead of a `finish` event to avoid uncaught exceptions Fixes: nodejs#29397
nodejs-github-bot
added
doc
Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
stream
Issues and PRs related to the stream subsystem.
labels
Sep 3, 2019
jasnell
approved these changes
Sep 3, 2019
vsemozhetbyt
reviewed
Sep 4, 2019
lpinca
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2019
@nodejs/streams |
trivikr
approved these changes
Sep 6, 2019
Trott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2019
Update writable stream code example using async iterator to use safer `finished()` method instead of a `finish` event to avoid uncaught exceptions Fixes: #29397 PR-URL: #29425 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Landed in 02f3dd2 |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2019
Update writable stream code example using async iterator to use safer `finished()` method instead of a `finish` event to avoid uncaught exceptions Fixes: #29397 PR-URL: #29425 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Merged
This was referenced Sep 25, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update writable stream code examples using async iterator to use safer
finished()
method instead of thefinish
event to avoid uncaughterrors
Fixes: #29397
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes