Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

errors: improve ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE #29675

Closed

Conversation

BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

Commit message 1: buffer: improve .from() error details

This makes sure the original input is passed to the error in case
no matching inputs are found. Instead of passing along all values,
only valid or possibliy valid values are passed through. That way
invalid values end up in the error case with the original input.

Commit message 2: errors: improve ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE

ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE is the most common error used throughout the
code base. This improves the error message by providing more details
to the user and by indicating more precisely which values are allowed
ones and which ones are not.

It adds the actual input to the error message in case it's a primitive.
If it's a class instance, it'll print the class name instead of
"object" and "falsy" or similar entries are not named "type" anymore.

The first commit is necessary to get the tests to pass. Otherwise the
error would not log the actual input but the unboxed value.

I am not completely certain if we should handle Object special instead of just handling it as any other regular type. Any options on that?

// cc @Trott

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. label Sep 23, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ function Server(options, requestListener) {
} else if (options == null || typeof options === 'object') {
options = { ...options };
} else {
throw new ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE('options', 'object', options);
throw new ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE('options', 'Object', options);
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott Sep 24, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's the justification for changing object to Object? Here are the things that come to mind as arguments against it:

  • typeof {} === 'object' and not 'Object'
  • Sure, you can do new Object() but you can also do new String() or new Number() and we don't capitalize those.
  • "Everything is lowercased" is an easy rule to remember. "Some things get an initial capital letter and other things don't" is more prone to human error.
  • No added value to the end user of saying Object instead of object.
  • Not doing that change will greatly reduce the diff size, making this easier to review as well as backport. It also reduces the risk of conflicts with other PRs.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The justification was that there are already multiple entries written as Object and the documentation uses Object instead of object. I personally actually favor object a tiny bit above Object. I just roughly remembered that there where comments about this in a PR quite a while ago (I do not remember which one though), so I thought I'll go for that.

This actually also applies to the type function. It is mostly written as Function.

@vsemozhetbyt I think you where involved in this discussion. Do you by any chance remember any details?

Copy link
Contributor

@vsemozhetbyt vsemozhetbyt Sep 24, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I cannot remember. I can only say that we use lower case for primitives and upper case for other types in doc parts that are based on tools/doc/type-parser.js, otherwise I cannot decide what is better for code and error messages.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Trott I am fine to convert all Function and Object entries to lower cased versions, if you think that's a good way to handle it. I personally favor that.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Trott I am fine to convert all Function and Object entries to lower cased versions, if you think that's a good way to handle it. I personally favor that.

I'm fine either way.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

when talking about the type I expect it to correspond to typeof input === 'object'. When Object is used I would expect the direct prototype to be `Object

I might be misunderstanding you, but those seem like arguments for keeping lowercase object here, because it is about typeof and not the prototype constructor name?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's correct that we use typeof input === 'object' in (probably) all of these cases. But when we do, we normally mean the object should have Object as prototype (or a null prototype as in Object.create(null)).

The example above is more intuitive for me if it's written as:
The "error" argument must be of type function or an instance of Object, Error, or RegExp. That way I would immediately expect the input to be allowed to look like:

let input = {} // Valid
input = /a/ // Valid
input = new TypeError() // Valid
input = new Map() // Invalid

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@addaleax what do you think would be best here? The PR should overall reduce ambiguity and seems clearer than before.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But when we do, we normally mean the object should have Object as prototype (or a null prototype as in Object.create(null)).

I don’t think that’s true, and the way that JS objects work, the Map instance in your example is valid because we can attach regular properties to it, too.

So I’d personally stick with the current formatting of lowercase object unless we actually perform some kind of instanceof-style check.

Copy link
Member Author

@BridgeAR BridgeAR Sep 26, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are correct that it would be possible to use any object if we do the typecheck only. What we normally do is a check for a specific class, than another one and in the end we accept any object as long as it seems to fit.

However, we do mostly not accept null and that is also of type object.

I decided to go for a middle ground and hope that is good for everyone: if no class is detected, we'll always use type in combination with object. If we detect a class and object as accepted values, we'll declare it as instance of Object. This condition is pretty rare and I could only find few errors where this would apply too. That way we'll keep the distinction between different object types and use type of object in almost all other cases.

Is that fine for you?

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the review wanted PRs that need reviews. label Sep 26, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Oct 1, 2019

@nodejs/collaborators This could use some reviews.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR force-pushed the improve-ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE-2 branch from e5c6854 to 9284e5e Compare November 26, 2019 18:33
message: 'The "job" argument must be of type ModuleJob. ' +
'Received type string'
message: 'The "job" argument must be an instance of ModuleJob. ' +
"Received type string ('notamodulejob')"
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott Dec 19, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Micro-nit, but in messages like this one, I think it's more idiomatic for strings to be in double-quotes. Of course, both are fine in JavaScript so feel free to ignore this. People will know what is meant. (Only noticed it myself because job on the line above is in double quotes, but that's not even a string variable value, it's an identifier, so
¯\(ツ)/¯ but I did have to stop and wonder why one was in double-quotes and another in single-quotes.)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I rely upon .inspect() in this case and it's not possible to configure the quotation in that case. Therefore I'd stick to this for now (even though it would be possible to special handle strings).

This makes sure the original input is passed to the error in case
no matching inputs are found. Instead of passing along all values,
only valid or possibliy valid values are passed through. That way
invalid values end up in the error case with the original input.
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE is the most common error used throughout the
code base. This improves the error message by providing more details
to the user and by indicating more precisely which values are allowed
ones and which ones are not.

It adds the actual input to the error message in case it's a primitive.
If it's a class instance, it'll print the class name instead of
"object" and "falsy" or similar entries are not named "type" anymore.
@BridgeAR BridgeAR force-pushed the improve-ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE-2 branch from 9284e5e to b033324 Compare December 19, 2019 18:58
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Dec 20, 2019
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

BridgeAR added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2019
This makes sure the original input is passed to the error in case
no matching inputs are found. Instead of passing along all values,
only valid or possibliy valid values are passed through. That way
invalid values end up in the error case with the original input.

PR-URL: #29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
BridgeAR added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2019
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE is the most common error used throughout the
code base. This improves the error message by providing more details
to the user and by indicating more precisely which values are allowed
ones and which ones are not.

It adds the actual input to the error message in case it's a primitive.
If it's a class instance, it'll print the class name instead of
"object" and "falsy" or similar entries are not named "type" anymore.

PR-URL: #29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in fc28761, ac2fc0d 🎉

@BridgeAR BridgeAR closed this Dec 20, 2019
BridgeAR added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2020
This makes sure the original input is passed to the error in case
no matching inputs are found. Instead of passing along all values,
only valid or possibliy valid values are passed through. That way
invalid values end up in the error case with the original input.

PR-URL: #29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
BridgeAR added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2020
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE is the most common error used throughout the
code base. This improves the error message by providing more details
to the user and by indicating more precisely which values are allowed
ones and which ones are not.

It adds the actual input to the error message in case it's a primitive.
If it's a class instance, it'll print the class name instead of
"object" and "falsy" or similar entries are not named "type" anymore.

PR-URL: #29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@BridgeAR BridgeAR mentioned this pull request Jan 7, 2020
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
This makes sure the original input is passed to the error in case
no matching inputs are found. Instead of passing along all values,
only valid or possibliy valid values are passed through. That way
invalid values end up in the error case with the original input.

PR-URL: #29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2020
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE is the most common error used throughout the
code base. This improves the error message by providing more details
to the user and by indicating more precisely which values are allowed
ones and which ones are not.

It adds the actual input to the error message in case it's a primitive.
If it's a class instance, it'll print the class name instead of
"object" and "falsy" or similar entries are not named "type" anymore.

PR-URL: #29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
This makes sure the original input is passed to the error in case
no matching inputs are found. Instead of passing along all values,
only valid or possibliy valid values are passed through. That way
invalid values end up in the error case with the original input.

PR-URL: #29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
BethGriggs pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 6, 2020
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE is the most common error used throughout the
code base. This improves the error message by providing more details
to the user and by indicating more precisely which values are allowed
ones and which ones are not.

It adds the actual input to the error message in case it's a primitive.
If it's a class instance, it'll print the class name instead of
"object" and "falsy" or similar entries are not named "type" anymore.

PR-URL: #29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. review wanted PRs that need reviews.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants