Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

doc: remove dashes #30101

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2019
Merged

doc: remove dashes #30101

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2019

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Oct 24, 2019

The use of dashes -- in general, but especially in our docs -- can be
problematic. It is used inconsistently and there is always another form
of punctuation that is as good or better for the situation. In an effort
to reduce the number of variations we use to display the same types of
information, remove the various uses of dashes from the documentation.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Oct 24, 2019
richardlau
richardlau reviewed Oct 24, 2019
View reviewed changes
doc/api/addons.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Oct 26, 2019

Lite CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request-lite-pipeline/4011/

@Trott Trott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Oct 26, 2019
@Trott
doc: remove dashes
1004050 
The use of dashes -- in general, but especially in our docs -- can be
problematic. It is used inconsistently and there is always another form
of punctuation that is as good or better for the situation. In an effort
to reduce the number of variations we use to display the same types of
information, remove the various uses of dashes from the documentation.

PR-URL: nodejs#30101
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Trott Trott merged commit 1004050 into nodejs:master Oct 26, 2019
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Oct 26, 2019

Landed in 1004050

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2019
@Trott @targos
doc: remove dashes
45c70a9 
The use of dashes -- in general, but especially in our docs -- can be
problematic. It is used inconsistently and there is always another form
of punctuation that is as good or better for the situation. In an effort
to reduce the number of variations we use to display the same types of
information, remove the various uses of dashes from the documentation.

PR-URL: #30101
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 5, 2019
Merged
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2019
@Trott @targos
doc: remove dashes
b139bd2 
The use of dashes -- in general, but especially in our docs -- can be
problematic. It is used inconsistently and there is always another form
of punctuation that is as good or better for the situation. In an effort
to reduce the number of variations we use to display the same types of
information, remove the various uses of dashes from the documentation.

PR-URL: #30101
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2019
@Trott @targos
doc: remove dashes
43bc013 
The use of dashes -- in general, but especially in our docs -- can be
problematic. It is used inconsistently and there is always another form
of punctuation that is as good or better for the situation. In an effort
to reduce the number of variations we use to display the same types of
information, remove the various uses of dashes from the documentation.

PR-URL: #30101
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2019
@Trott @targos
doc: remove dashes
e81f303 
The use of dashes -- in general, but especially in our docs -- can be
problematic. It is used inconsistently and there is always another form
of punctuation that is as good or better for the situation. In an effort
to reduce the number of variations we use to display the same types of
information, remove the various uses of dashes from the documentation.

PR-URL: #30101
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@targos targos mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2019
Merged
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2019
@Trott @targos
doc: remove dashes
ee954d5 
The use of dashes -- in general, but especially in our docs -- can be
problematic. It is used inconsistently and there is always another form
of punctuation that is as good or better for the situation. In an effort
to reduce the number of variations we use to display the same types of
information, remove the various uses of dashes from the documentation.

PR-URL: #30101
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Trott Trott deleted the dash-it branch January 13, 2022 22:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rickyes rickyes rickyes approved these changes

@trivikr trivikr trivikr approved these changes

@gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil approved these changes

@richardlau richardlau richardlau approved these changes

@jasnell jasnell jasnell approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@Trott @jasnell @richardlau @gireeshpunathil @trivikr @rickyes @nodejs-github-bot