-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src: isolate->Dispose() order consistency #30181
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
nodejs-github-bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
worker
Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
labels
Oct 30, 2019
cjihrig
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2019
addaleax
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2019
addaleax
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Oct 30, 2019
devsnek
approved these changes
Oct 30, 2019
devnexen
approved these changes
Oct 31, 2019
Landed in 312c02d |
codebytere
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2019
PR-URL: #30181 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2019
PR-URL: #30181 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2019
PR-URL: #30181 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2019
PR-URL: #30181 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2019
PR-URL: #30181 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2019
PR-URL: #30181 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
addaleax
added a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2019
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer relevant. I was wrong. This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal of 312c02d. Fixes: nodejs#30846 Refs: nodejs#30181
2 tasks
Trott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2019
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer relevant. I was wrong. This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal of 312c02d. Fixes: #30846 Refs: #30181 PR-URL: #30909 Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2019
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer relevant. I was wrong. This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal of 312c02d. Fixes: #30846 Refs: #30181 PR-URL: #30909 Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2020
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer relevant. I was wrong. This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal of 312c02d. Fixes: #30846 Refs: #30181 PR-URL: #30909 Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
I previously thought the order of these calls was no longer relevant. I was wrong. This commit undoes the changes from 312c02d, adds a comment explaining why I was wrong, and flips the order of the calls elsewhere for consistency, the latter having been the goal of 312c02d. Fixes: #30846 Refs: #30181 PR-URL: #30909 Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
addaleax
added
the
v8 platform
Issues and PRs related to Node's v8::Platform implementation.
label
Feb 18, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
v8 platform
Issues and PRs related to Node's v8::Platform implementation.
worker
Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removes comment from
UnregisterIsolate()
specifying thatIsolate::Dispose()
should be called afterUnregisterIsolate()
since that's no longer the case.This was originally added to account for issues in V8 but now there should be no relevant tasks running during either call so their order is fungible. However, for consistency's sake, we were calling most of these in the same order (dispose and then unregister) so this also moves a straggling call from
node_worker
to bring it in line with all others.cc @addaleax
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes