-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
module: expose exports conditions to loaders #31303
Conversation
/cc @nodejs/modules-active-members |
Nice work, this approach seems great! |
test/fixtures/es-module-loaders/loader-with-custom-condition.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
d05c96e
to
66ebe58
Compare
Cleaned up and marking as ready for review. I updated the implementation to use a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like a nice approach.
test/fixtures/es-module-loaders/loader-with-custom-condition.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
66ebe58
to
7c15d59
Compare
Ping @nodejs/modules-active-members, this is still lacking some reviews/approvals before we can land it. Adding it to the agenda in case it's still open by our next meeting. :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really like this PR! This falls into some things we are starting to see from the community about custom conditions like https://twitter.com/sebmarkbage/status/1234223477424447488 .
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
test/fixtures/es-module-loaders/loader-with-custom-condition.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be great to see this moving forward :)
test/fixtures/es-module-loaders/loader-with-custom-condition.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
8703335
to
19b2f4f
Compare
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/30219/ (:heavy_check_mark:) |
19b2f4f
to
a14ba1e
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
a14ba1e
to
8108485
Compare
8108485
to
2267d17
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
2267d17
to
1549bc4
Compare
There's one C++ test that seems to fail on linuxone. I look into it briefly but I don't see a clear reason why it would fail (or what the failure really means). I'm surprised that this PR would affect low-level worker interactions but can't rule it out. |
Yes! This should be good to go, assuming CI comes back green. (And thanks for being on top of these build failures, much appreciated. :)) |
PR-URL: #31303 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com>
Landed in 9129ab1 |
PR-URL: #31303 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: #31303 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#31303 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com>
PR-URL: #31303 Reviewed-By: Bradley Farias <bradley.meck@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Guy Bedford <guybedford@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Geoffrey Booth <webmaster@geoffreybooth.com>
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes