-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: explain _writev() API #31356
Closed
Closed
doc: explain _writev() API #31356
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -1886,8 +1886,8 @@ methods only. | |||||
|
||||||
The `writable._writev()` method may be implemented in addition or alternatively | ||||||
to `writable._write()` in stream implementations that are capable of processing | ||||||
multiple chunks of data at once. If implemented, the method will be called with | ||||||
all chunks of data currently buffered in the write queue. | ||||||
multiple chunks of data at once. If implemented and if there are buffered data | ||||||
from previous writes, `_writev` will be called instead of `_write`. | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @Trott, thanks. Fixed it. |
||||||
|
||||||
The `writable._writev()` method is prefixed with an underscore because it is | ||||||
internal to the class that defines it, and should never be called directly by | ||||||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: "are buffered data" is correct (because the word data is plural) but treating data as a singular noun has become idiomatic, is generally considered correct too, and seems to be what we do in the docs. Treating data as a singular word is so common that "data are" sounds jarring to many people.
I am unable to find any other examples of "data" + "are" in our docs, but many "data" + "is":
buffer.md: "the data is zero-filled"
http2.md: "incoming data is not being read"
net.md: "when the data is finally" and "when data is received"
stream.md: "Writable streams are an abstraction for a destination to which data is..." and "Readable streams are an abstraction for a source from which data is..."
vm.md: "data is produced successfully"
...and many other examples.
Therefore, for consistency with the rest of the docs, I recommend switching this to "is":
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Trott, done.